Does Pawan Kalyan think that politics and people are characterless and/or ill quality ? Speaking among one-to-one may be characterless and/or ill quality. But speaking one-to-one-for-one has never been characterless and/or ill quality. People will not vote for leader who believes in one-to-one dialogues "but vote for leader who believes in sensible mindful voice". Mega brothers will be united if Pawan Kalyan joins Chiranjeevi for Indian national congress. Mega brothers suffer in their unity if Chiranjeevi joins Pawan Kalyan.for Jana sena. That is difference.










Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When there is no knowledge(which seeks self or sensible mindful voice)(literary words) to any mathematical or biochemical law,then it will be either self ignorance or social ignorance. So information thus obtained in other/s must be complexed(adverse) with self(sensible mindful voice) by applying one's mind on his/her mind again towards goal of equality(peace),love(retaining self as self in other/s) and truth(which solves deception appearance as deception can not stand against adverse questions). Law in universe is one. That law is being lawful only to lawful as society matures. And purpose of that universal law is to solve immorality(inconsistency against adverse questions)(being self in self and other/s) into morality(being other/s in self or being self in self). That means any voter can question universal law. But no voter can rise above universal law. Pl.note that any public questioner goal is to be public solution which means being public question to public question within self. Simple ! Govt audit looks after itself. And people(individuals) will looks after their audit "by being in groups/laws/parties". Govt is party to all diverse parties.