SAYING NEGATIVE TO OTHER/S NEGATIVE IS POSITIVE TO PREVAIL NEGATIVE FOR SOLVING OTHER/S NEGATIVITY.

DO ANYONE KNOW THAT LATE.NTR WHO SAID PEOPLE ARE GODS AND SOCIETY IS TEMPLE NEVER BELIEVED IN PEOPLE ?     IN STEAD,LATE.NTR ASKED PEOPLE TO BELIEVE HIM IN REALITY.      YES.LATE.NTR BELIEVED THAT PEOPLE ARE SHEEP WHILE INDIAN NATIONAL CONGRESS WAS NOT BEING HUMAN.      THAT WAS WHY SOCIETY MADE LATE.NTR DIE VIOLENT AND IGNONIMOUS DEATH.      LATE.NTR LAST DAYS AND VIOLENT -IGNONIMOUS DEATH WERE NOT BEING SO BECAUSE OF NARA CHANDRABABU NAIDU OR NANDAMURI LAKSHMIPARVATHI OR HIS KITH AND KIN OR HIS POLITICS.        

YES.WE NEED STUDY YEARS DURING WHICH ISLAM WAS FOUNDED IN MECCA.

ANY MAHARAJA PALACE IS ANTISOCIAL DEVIL PREVAILANCE IN PRESENT KNOWLEDGE AGE.

SOCIAL HAS TO BECOME TRUE SOCIAL IN REALITY.       FOR THAT,ANTISOCIAL HAS TO BE RESPECTED AND OBEYED BY SOCIAL AT FIRST.      THEN ONLY ANTISOCIAL IN BOTH ANTISOCIAL AND SOCIAL VANISHES.       THIS IS SECRET BEING IGNORED BY INDIANS.        

INDIAN MEDIA NEED BE TAUGHT ABOUT WHAT IS 'LEGAL' EVIDENCE .       HOW CAN A SPEECH BY MASOOD AZHAR BE LEGAL EVIDENCE ON TERROR ATTACK IN PULWAMA ?       A LEGAL EVIDENCE MEANS PROOF 'OTHERWISE'.       -------------------       FOR EXAMPLE,IF I DO A SPEECH AGAINST PAKISTAN GOVT HERE IN INDIA SAYING INDIAN SOLDIERS ARE FOLLOWING MY WORDS,WILL IT BE LEGAL EVIDENCE FOR PAKISTAN GOVT TO ASK ACTION AGAINST ME ?      PROBLEM LIES WITH THOSE WHO SEEK ACTION AGAINST 'PAKISTANI(but not pakistani govt)' TERRORISTS WHO BELIEVE IN HALF-TRUTHS AND HEAR-SAYINGS.       PL.REMEMBER PAKISTAN GOVT IS LEGAL GOVT WHO SHOULD AVOID ACTING ON HALF-TRUTHS AND HEAR-SAYINGS.      AND PAKISTAN GOVT IS SOVEREIGN GOVT WHICH SHOULD NOT BE PUPPET TO INDIA.     REMEMBER THAT PAKISTANI PEOPLE ARE GETTING RULED BY PAKISTAN GOVT BECAUSE PAKISTAN GOVT IS MORALLY-LEGAL THAN LEGALLY-MORAL INDIAN GOVT. ...

NATURAL SOCIAL PRINCIPLES ARE 1.WE CAN TALK GENERALLY ABOUT THING/S WHICH WE DON'T POSSESS AND 2.WE CAN GIVE ONLY WHAT WE POSSESS.