Exclusive: Pervez Musharraf Accepts Jaish's Role In Pulwama Attack, But ...
INDIAN MEDIA NEED BE TAUGHT ABOUT WHAT IS 'LEGAL' EVIDENCE .
HOW CAN A SPEECH BY MASOOD AZHAR BE LEGAL EVIDENCE ON TERROR ATTACK IN PULWAMA ?
A LEGAL EVIDENCE MEANS PROOF 'OTHERWISE'.
-------------------
FOR EXAMPLE,IF I DO A SPEECH AGAINST PAKISTAN GOVT HERE IN INDIA SAYING INDIAN SOLDIERS ARE FOLLOWING MY WORDS,WILL IT BE LEGAL EVIDENCE FOR PAKISTAN GOVT TO ASK ACTION AGAINST ME ?
PROBLEM LIES WITH THOSE WHO SEEK ACTION AGAINST 'PAKISTANI(but not pakistani govt)' TERRORISTS WHO BELIEVE IN HALF-TRUTHS AND HEAR-SAYINGS.
PL.REMEMBER PAKISTAN GOVT IS LEGAL GOVT WHO SHOULD AVOID ACTING ON HALF-TRUTHS AND HEAR-SAYINGS.
AND PAKISTAN GOVT IS SOVEREIGN GOVT WHICH SHOULD NOT BE PUPPET TO INDIA.
REMEMBER THAT PAKISTANI PEOPLE ARE GETTING RULED BY PAKISTAN GOVT BECAUSE PAKISTAN GOVT IS MORALLY-LEGAL THAN LEGALLY-MORAL INDIAN GOVT.
INDIA IS MINISCULE WORLD.
WHEREAS PAKISTAN IS ANTIWORLD TO WORLD BUT NOT ANTIWORLD TO INDIAN PEOPLE.
HOW CAN A SPEECH BY MASOOD AZHAR BE LEGAL EVIDENCE ON TERROR ATTACK IN PULWAMA ?
A LEGAL EVIDENCE MEANS PROOF 'OTHERWISE'.
-------------------
FOR EXAMPLE,IF I DO A SPEECH AGAINST PAKISTAN GOVT HERE IN INDIA SAYING INDIAN SOLDIERS ARE FOLLOWING MY WORDS,WILL IT BE LEGAL EVIDENCE FOR PAKISTAN GOVT TO ASK ACTION AGAINST ME ?
PROBLEM LIES WITH THOSE WHO SEEK ACTION AGAINST 'PAKISTANI(but not pakistani govt)' TERRORISTS WHO BELIEVE IN HALF-TRUTHS AND HEAR-SAYINGS.
PL.REMEMBER PAKISTAN GOVT IS LEGAL GOVT WHO SHOULD AVOID ACTING ON HALF-TRUTHS AND HEAR-SAYINGS.
AND PAKISTAN GOVT IS SOVEREIGN GOVT WHICH SHOULD NOT BE PUPPET TO INDIA.
REMEMBER THAT PAKISTANI PEOPLE ARE GETTING RULED BY PAKISTAN GOVT BECAUSE PAKISTAN GOVT IS MORALLY-LEGAL THAN LEGALLY-MORAL INDIAN GOVT.
INDIA IS MINISCULE WORLD.
WHEREAS PAKISTAN IS ANTIWORLD TO WORLD BUT NOT ANTIWORLD TO INDIAN PEOPLE.
Comments