Mr.Ram jethmalani ! Can you hear me ? Place of argument is within law court. Place of interview is before tv channel. You are arguing and shouting before tv camera. LAWYER SHOULD NOT ARGUE IN PUBLIC BUT IN COURTROOM. It seems that ram jethmalani has become mental patient who argues in public. Media asks perverted questions which will solve collusive-mindset and rotten-mindset. Ram jethmalani ! You can do whatever you want in court at which court takes action on it, But here before tv camera,you should not behave as you want. You need answer media questions with patience. MEDIA IS NOT LAWYER PROPERTY. Is it sense if lawyers are arguing both in court and in public ?


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When there is no knowledge(which seeks self or sensible mindful voice)(literary words) to any mathematical or biochemical law,then it will be either self ignorance or social ignorance. So information thus obtained in other/s must be complexed(adverse) with self(sensible mindful voice) by applying one's mind on his/her mind again towards goal of equality(peace),love(retaining self as self in other/s) and truth(which solves deception appearance as deception can not stand against adverse questions). Law in universe is one. That law is being lawful only to lawful as society matures. And purpose of that universal law is to solve immorality(inconsistency against adverse questions)(being self in self and other/s) into morality(being other/s in self or being self in self). That means any voter can question universal law. But no voter can rise above universal law. Pl.note that any public questioner goal is to be public solution which means being public question to public question within self. Simple ! Govt audit looks after itself. And people(individuals) will looks after their audit "by being in groups/laws/parties". Govt is party to all diverse parties.