Law colleges need change to become information technology institutes. Law-pundits need know that CRIMINAL(antisocial)(ignorant) COURT CAN NEVER SOLVE CRIME.BUT CRIMINAL COURT CAN AWARD.HARSH PUNISHMENT AND HEAVY PENALTY to deter future offenders. O Supreme Court Chief Justice ! There is difference between crime and criminal. Crime and ill can be made to self-eliminate by itself through socio-political process in social-mature(humanist) democracy. Society has one and only one.political(congress) ideology of its own against crime and ill. But law court that works under natural(social) principle of justice enforces that one and only one(congress) ideology by weapon-holding. So law court system even though independent should not have freedom on society and its(congress) ideology.But law court system has freedom on ideology on enforcing procedures of punishment. There is difference between societal ideology(congress) and criminal(by law) procedures ideology.

Law(mind)(heart)(sense)(name) can't be (made) profession.
Law is Veda.
వేదము అనగా వాక్కు కలిగి ఉండుట .
కలిగి ఉన్నదానిని వృత్తిగా చేసుకోలేము ఈ పరిపక్వ సామాజిక -మానవతావాద సమాజములో.
వృత్తి అనేది తన సహకారము ద్వారా ఇతరుల ఉపయోగము కొరకు .
------------------
ఉందిలే మంచి కాలము ముందు ముందున ....
......... ........... .......
అందరి కోసం ఒక్కరు నిలిచి
ఒక్కరి కోసం అందరు కలిసి
 ........  .....
సహకారమే మన వైఖరి అయితే
ఉపకారమే మన వైఖరి అయితే
తేడా గొప్పా వాదము ఉండదు .
ఆ రోజు నేడో రేపో అవుతుంది .
........... ...........




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When there is no knowledge(which seeks self or sensible mindful voice)(literary words) to any mathematical or biochemical law,then it will be either self ignorance or social ignorance. So information thus obtained in other/s must be complexed(adverse) with self(sensible mindful voice) by applying one's mind on his/her mind again towards goal of equality(peace),love(retaining self as self in other/s) and truth(which solves deception appearance as deception can not stand against adverse questions). Law in universe is one. That law is being lawful only to lawful as society matures. And purpose of that universal law is to solve immorality(inconsistency against adverse questions)(being self in self and other/s) into morality(being other/s in self or being self in self). That means any voter can question universal law. But no voter can rise above universal law. Pl.note that any public questioner goal is to be public solution which means being public question to public question within self. Simple ! Govt audit looks after itself. And people(individuals) will looks after their audit "by being in groups/laws/parties". Govt is party to all diverse parties.