Indian Supreme Court Chief Justice should have passed judgement on society that social.intolerance is natural against appeasement and pampering of social minorities and weaker sections in bettering world socio-economics. Indian Supreme Court Chief Justice should remember in first,next,last and ultimate that he is employee of head of govt of India between head of state of India. Indian Supreme Court Chief Justice should not take cognisance of fears expressed by social minorities and weaker sections. Indian Supreme Court Chief Justice must note that his seat can only give judgement on both sides.arguments before his seat. Indian Supreme Court Chief Justice should not take liberty against head of govt of India and president of India REITERATIONS. If Indian Supreme Court Chief Justice wishes to take liberty to talk against fears beyond court purview,he should keep abreast about world socio-economic indices supplied by reserve bank of India governor year-by-year.

Indian Supreme Court justice is thinking that he is above law by implying that why fear about social intolerance against appeasement and pampering of social minorities when judicial system is there.
    Indian Supreme Court Chief Justice is not above govt of India,Indian Parliament and president of India.