Chandrababu Naidu spends ₹100 cr





   AP STATE CM NARA CHANDRABABU NAIDU IS BRILLIANT LIVING EXAMPLE OF 'HOW RULERS OF FORMER INDIAN PRINCELY STATES INDUCED FOREIGN INVADERS TO CONQUER AND ENSLAVE POLITICAL INDIA?'.

   NARA CHANDRABABU NAIDU SAYS GOOD THINGS WITHOUT BEING GOOD.

    ON THE OTHER HAND,INDIAN NATIONAL CONGRESS "APPEARS AS SAYING GOOD THINGS" IN IMMATURE SOCIAL DEMOCRACY BY BEING GOOD.

    AND PUBLIC SHOULD NOT IGNORE THEIR NEED(DUTY) TO READ FINE PRINT(SENSE) IN BETWEEN LINES OF INDIAN NATIONAL CONGRESS SPEECHES/WORDS. 

    THAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN NARA CHANDRABABU NAIDU AND INDIAN NATIONAL CONGRESS.  


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When there is no knowledge(which seeks self or sensible mindful voice)(literary words) to any mathematical or biochemical law,then it will be either self ignorance or social ignorance. So information thus obtained in other/s must be complexed(adverse) with self(sensible mindful voice) by applying one's mind on his/her mind again towards goal of equality(peace),love(retaining self as self in other/s) and truth(which solves deception appearance as deception can not stand against adverse questions). Law in universe is one. That law is being lawful only to lawful as society matures. And purpose of that universal law is to solve immorality(inconsistency against adverse questions)(being self in self and other/s) into morality(being other/s in self or being self in self). That means any voter can question universal law. But no voter can rise above universal law. Pl.note that any public questioner goal is to be public solution which means being public question to public question within self. Simple ! Govt audit looks after itself. And people(individuals) will looks after their audit "by being in groups/laws/parties". Govt is party to all diverse parties.