IS THIEF/TEMPTING LADY EXPLANATION ABOUT GITA/INDIAN CONSTITUTION LEGAL?

Mind strength becomes weak by excessive self-social interaction since childhood.
So 1)read mahabharat explanations of scholars by their name through english medium towards change of character after mistake being global.2)discuss ramayan explanations of scholars by their name through english medium.3)devote to self by reading bhagavatham explanations of scholars by their name in english medium.
I found many listeners who neglect scholars names for comparison & discussion about their self being to get explained about mahabharat,ramayan & bhagavatham.It is wrong.
If anyone wish to buy & read a book of explanation for any text,he/she must verify the author's credentials to explain original text.
We must read about author first & index next before buying/borrowing to read his/her book angle of explanation.
Suppose a thief/tempting lady may interpret bhagavadgita/indian constitution about activity/gender equality from his/her angle of explanation.Then how can we believe his/her explanation for bhagavadgita/indian constitution about their "work without asking"/"gender difference"?
So read about author credentials before listening/reading his/her explanation of text!
Above tip gives public discretion about selfish adminstrators & name-faceless instructors.
If public discretion becomes more,public controversies will be less therby to give courts & police ample time for true welfare.
Many hindu texts are explained by illegal authors in history.
Indians & americans need research about illegal authors of explanation about text through their university history depts by internet blog.
Let's be writers about writers of explanation about sacred vedic texts in hindu/islamic/christian world.
All explanatory scholars/authors need not be ideal in their lives!
We find many wrongfuls writing explanations of hindu texts in their times towards change in hindu rituals/revivalism.
Let's punish those wrongfuls of history by putting their names in public blacklist now.
Internet age is NOW & THEN by more public discretion & less controversies.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When there is no knowledge(which seeks self or sensible mindful voice)(literary words) to any mathematical or biochemical law,then it will be either self ignorance or social ignorance. So information thus obtained in other/s must be complexed(adverse) with self(sensible mindful voice) by applying one's mind on his/her mind again towards goal of equality(peace),love(retaining self as self in other/s) and truth(which solves deception appearance as deception can not stand against adverse questions). Law in universe is one. That law is being lawful only to lawful as society matures. And purpose of that universal law is to solve immorality(inconsistency against adverse questions)(being self in self and other/s) into morality(being other/s in self or being self in self). That means any voter can question universal law. But no voter can rise above universal law. Pl.note that any public questioner goal is to be public solution which means being public question to public question within self. Simple ! Govt audit looks after itself. And people(individuals) will looks after their audit "by being in groups/laws/parties". Govt is party to all diverse parties.