Human being need not beg or borrow or expose self in public to earn name. By having name for self,human being provokes other/s minds(not sense/heart as indian police and indian law courts do) through his WORD(sensibility)(noun-verb-pronoun-adjective) propagation. So to avoid begging,borrowing and exposing self,social networks came into existence to propagate WORD(sensibility) of his own self FOR MAKING SELF AS MUCH USEFUL AS TO OTHER/S. That is litigancy(knowledge) whcih seeks self towards avoiding speaking other/s name words. In other words,it is PRECISION OF TRUT.H(knowledge) between appearing knowledge and true knowledge. For example,AP CM Nara chandrababau naidu is not having WORD(sensibility) of his own as he lacks personally right character(feeling). As he can't have word(heart) of his own,he can't make other/s as sensibles even though he is provoking other/s minds. That means a user mindset like Nara Chandrababu Naidu words can't make useful to other/s as much as to his self. Either self or other/s will suffer in usefulness of his words. So my point is that one must have personally right character which means socially wrong character like Indian national congress character to make public service as sensible. Yes ! Of course ! A personally right character words are bitter and moderate which are extremist to extremist-minds. But as prevailance matters in truth(power),personally right character words prevail as sweet and true extremist. Today is being. Tomorrow is prevailance. One should live today for tomorrow. Otherwise one will be made so by other/s. So appear bad today to prevail as much good to self and other/s.

మనిషి తనకు మొదటగా లేకపోతే ఆలోచన (పేరు ) కలిగించుకుంటాడు .తద్వారా ఆ ఆలోచన (పేరు ) ను స్వయం సంపాదన చేసుకుంటాడు. తరువాతగా ఆ పేరు (ఆలోచన ) మీదుగా జీవిస్తాడు . అంతిమంగా మరణానంతరము ఆ పేరు (ఆలోచన ) మీదుగా నిలుస్తాడు .
--------
2).
     ఆలోచన (పేరు ) కలిగిన వాడు ఇతరులకు తన మాట (కర్త -క్రియ -కర్మ -విశేషణము ) కలుగ చేయాలని లక్ష్యము కలిగి ఏర్పరచుకుని తద్వారా భావోద్రేకము ద్వారా నిలిచే భావోత్తేజమును కలిగించుకుంటాడు .
      దాని వలన తాను తన మాట (ఆలోచన ) ద్వారా తనకు ఎంత ఉపయోగము కలిగించుకుంటాడో ఇతరులకు కూడా అంతే ఉపయోగము కలిగిస్తాడు .
---------
3).
     దానికి సోషల్ నెట్ వర్క్ లు కావాలి .
      అంతిమంగా మైండ్ (వృత్తి ) కి మరియు భావన(వాయిస్ ) కు మధ్య తేడా బాగా అందరికీ అర్ధమవుతుంది . అదే శాశ్వత శాంతి (సమత ). లేనిచో నిరంతరము వాదనలు మరియు తాత్కాలిక శాంతి (సమత ) నిలుస్తాయి .

 
     


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Media is antisocial by nature of existence.So any accused need not have duty to answer media questions. Vijay Mallya ! If media exceeds its limit,then media should be in jail. This is my order.

When there is no knowledge(which seeks self or sensible mindful voice)(literary words) to any mathematical or biochemical law,then it will be either self ignorance or social ignorance. So information thus obtained in other/s must be complexed(adverse) with self(sensible mindful voice) by applying one's mind on his/her mind again towards goal of equality(peace),love(retaining self as self in other/s) and truth(which solves deception appearance as deception can not stand against adverse questions). Law in universe is one. That law is being lawful only to lawful as society matures. And purpose of that universal law is to solve immorality(inconsistency against adverse questions)(being self in self and other/s) into morality(being other/s in self or being self in self). That means any voter can question universal law. But no voter can rise above universal law. Pl.note that any public questioner goal is to be public solution which means being public question to public question within self. Simple ! Govt audit looks after itself. And people(individuals) will looks after their audit "by being in groups/laws/parties". Govt is party to all diverse parties.