Social-mind "which is personal-mind TO personal-mind" JUST APPEARS to follow a pattern of its own sense. Social-mind which is "being personal-mind TO personal-mind" exists to solve personal-mind. So there can't be existence of personal-mind TO solve social-mind. Because prevailance is social-mind but not personal-mind. AND WE AS HUMAN BEINGS SHOULD CRAVE FOR THINGS THAT HAVE PREVAILANCE. HOW CAN WE HUMAN BEINGS CRAVE FOR THINGS THAT HAVE EXISTENCE WITHOUT PREVAILANCE ? Can immorals(inconsistents against adverse questions)(personal-MIND) prevail over morals(consistents against adverse questions)(social-mind) ? I HEREBY REITERATE THAT PRESENT STRUGGLE IN WORLD SOCIETY IS BETWEEN IMMORALS(who use public imagiantion)(inconsistents against adverse questions)(personal-mind)(RAVANA-ASURA OR RAVANA-BRAHMA) AND MORALS(who are "public imagiantion TO public imagination" by using those who use public imagination)(consistents against adverse questions) FOR TRUTH(power) AT THE ULTIMATE. That means selfish worship of god(fear) by having god(fear) without overcoming god(fear) is,has to be and will be destined NATURALLY towards "prayer/s by devotees who don't apply mind FOR prasadam (resultant fruit) to devotees who apply mind on mind). I reiterate that bhagavadgita clearly says against "saying without being". Truth is moral(consistent against adverse questions) power which is BEING SELF BY SAYING OTHER SO.