Nobody supports indiscrete lending to borrowers. I get angry when I see lender asking borrower to repay principal and interest instalments. Do lenders think that money can be played without any adverse questions about head of account and name ? We should make new comprehensive finance law against indiscrete lending to borrowers. Interest money is not income but penalty. If lender wants to penalise(charge interest or principal) borrower by giving away his/her money,it is financial.extremism(self-ignorance). GOVT MUST ARREST FINANCIAL EXTREMISM CAUSED BY INDISCRETE LENDING.

విచక్షణ లేకుండా తన డబ్బును ఇంకొకరు అడిగారని అప్పు(చీటీ) ఇవ్వడము(వేయడము ) మహా నేరము .
విచక్షణ లేకుండా తన డబ్బును ఇంకొకరికి ఇచ్ఛే వారు ఉంటే తీర్చలేని అడిగే వారు ఎప్పుడూ ఉంటారు .


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When there is no knowledge(which seeks self or sensible mindful voice)(literary words) to any mathematical or biochemical law,then it will be either self ignorance or social ignorance. So information thus obtained in other/s must be complexed(adverse) with self(sensible mindful voice) by applying one's mind on his/her mind again towards goal of equality(peace),love(retaining self as self in other/s) and truth(which solves deception appearance as deception can not stand against adverse questions). Law in universe is one. That law is being lawful only to lawful as society matures. And purpose of that universal law is to solve immorality(inconsistency against adverse questions)(being self in self and other/s) into morality(being other/s in self or being self in self). That means any voter can question universal law. But no voter can rise above universal law. Pl.note that any public questioner goal is to be public solution which means being public question to public question within self. Simple ! Govt audit looks after itself. And people(individuals) will looks after their audit "by being in groups/laws/parties". Govt is party to all diverse parties.