HOW CAN AN ASPIRANT(PREVIOUSLY ELECTED LEADER) BE TREATED EQUAL WITH CONTESTANTS IN PRESENT ELECTION? IS IT NOT DISRESPECT TOWARDS PREVIOUS ELECTION RESULT BY CONTESTANTS AT PRESENT ? PL.STUDY THIS FINE POINT FOR PAST-CONTINUITY.

       I WISH TO TELL AN INTERESTING POINT ON ELECTION.
       IN DEMOCRATIC ELECTION,THERE IS ASPIRANT(SUCCESS)(HERO AND CHARACTER ARTIST) AND CONTESTANT(FAILURE)(COMEDIAN AND VILLAIN).
       SO CONTESTANT PARTIES NEED QUESTION ASPIRANTS BETTER TO AVOID FALSE PROMISES EVERYDAY OVER 48 DAYS.
       MAKING FALSE PROMISES BY ASPIRANT WILL LEAD TO NON-PERFORMANCE AFTER ELECTION.
--------------------------------------------
      And one more important thing! Indian police are in the habit of treating aspirant parties and contestant parties at equal level.
      AN ASPIRANT IS PREVIOUSLY ELECTED LEADER SEEKING RE-ELECTION.
     HOW CAN AN ASPIRANT(who was already previously elected leader) BE EQUAL IN STATURE WITH CONTESTANTS?  
     Of course,an aspirant(whose tenure may have dis-satisfaction for some sections of voters) may not have satisfaction of all voters at present but remember that an aspirant was previously elected leader.
      So an aspirant may be questioned better by contestants for voters but should not be treated equal with contestants by indian police and election commission.  


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When there is no knowledge(which seeks self or sensible mindful voice)(literary words) to any mathematical or biochemical law,then it will be either self ignorance or social ignorance. So information thus obtained in other/s must be complexed(adverse) with self(sensible mindful voice) by applying one's mind on his/her mind again towards goal of equality(peace),love(retaining self as self in other/s) and truth(which solves deception appearance as deception can not stand against adverse questions). Law in universe is one. That law is being lawful only to lawful as society matures. And purpose of that universal law is to solve immorality(inconsistency against adverse questions)(being self in self and other/s) into morality(being other/s in self or being self in self). That means any voter can question universal law. But no voter can rise above universal law. Pl.note that any public questioner goal is to be public solution which means being public question to public question within self. Simple ! Govt audit looks after itself. And people(individuals) will looks after their audit "by being in groups/laws/parties". Govt is party to all diverse parties.