Discussion on T bill with Constitution expert Padmabhushan PC Rao - excl...

    Constitution expert THEN in law ministry padmabhushan P C Rao! 

    I am addressing you THROUGH THIS SOCIAL BLOG in social-system which has instances of immaturity and maturity.

    You are voicing your words before mediaperson.

    2).This blog-post words are objective-thought by subjective-mind.

    Your words are subjective-thought(sense) only to mediaperson.

    3).Your words are not in consistent with ever-changing system AND SOCIETY.

        Your words are just consistent with court of law.

        Your words are negative sense with society.

        Your words are positive sense towards court of law.

     4).Regarding lack of statement of objects-reasons and financial memorandum in telangana bill to be tabled in parliament,LET PARLIAMENT,ITS SECRETARY-GENERAL AND PRESIDENT OF INDIA DECIDE.Why you are commenting on it?

      5).For a question like telangana,there SHOULD NOT BE question in media(forums outside parliament and state legislature) by constitutional expert in worked law ministry.

       6).IN TODAY'S SOCIETY,NEUTRAL-BY-POSITIVE SENSE SHOULD PREVAIL OVER POSITIVE SENSE(argument).

       7).IN SOCIETY,THERE CAN BE PEACEFUL PROTESTS,DISCUSSIONS AND COMMENTS but there should not be counter-protests,counter-discussions and counter-comments as in case of telangana.

        8).What constitution expert P C Rao tells is purely technical-without-proper-context.

        9).If we THE PEOPLE see gravity of ground reality in telangana,constitutional expert P C Rao is obstructing formation of telangana state.

         And telangana people will restart vexed agitation if andhrapradesh state is not bifurcated as per bill CAUSING REMEDY WORSE THAN ILLNESS.

        10).TELANGANA AGITATION IS PEOPLE'S AGITATION even though started by "SELFISH" TRS party.

         11).In maturity,selfish samaikya-andhra agitation need be countered-solved by selfish party only.

----------------------------------------

   SO BOTH PARLIAMENT AND PRESIDENT OF INDIA SHOULD NOT DISCUSS ABOUT FRIVOLOUS ISSUE LIKE IGNORING STATEMENT OF OBJECTS-REASONS AND FINANCIAL MEMORANDUM.

-------------------------------------

     This is my preliminary statement on today's above issue.