Anti-Islamic Saudi Royal Family Completely Exposed



        THESE MEDIA PEOPLE LACK MORAL FEELING(CHARACTER).
     IF SAUDI ROYAL FAMILY IS ISLAMIC,MEDIA SAYS THAT IT IS ISLAMIC-RELIGIOUS.
     IF SAME SAUDI ROYAL FAMILY IS ANTI-ISLAMIC,MEDIA SAYS THAT IT IS ANTI-ISLAMIC.
     WILL IT BE MORALLY-RIGHT FOR MEDIA TO BE DOUBLE-TONGUE? 
     SO THE PROBLEM IS NOT IN SAUDI ROYAL FAMILY ALONE.PROBLEM IS IN MEDIA CHARACTERLESSNESS.
     PL.NOTE THAT MEDIA PEOPLE SHOULD AVOID BEING ALL IN SOME.
     IT IS NOTHING WRONG FOR MEDIA PEOPLE BY NAME/S TO TAKE SIDES ON RELIGIOUS(LAW)(MIND) MATTERS.
     WITHOUT PERSON AND NAME-VOICE,HOW CAN ANYONE HAVE RIGHT-FEELING ON ANY OTHER PERSON/S?

kota sri nivasa rao 
      

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When there is no knowledge(which seeks self or sensible mindful voice)(literary words) to any mathematical or biochemical law,then it will be either self ignorance or social ignorance. So information thus obtained in other/s must be complexed(adverse) with self(sensible mindful voice) by applying one's mind on his/her mind again towards goal of equality(peace),love(retaining self as self in other/s) and truth(which solves deception appearance as deception can not stand against adverse questions). Law in universe is one. That law is being lawful only to lawful as society matures. And purpose of that universal law is to solve immorality(inconsistency against adverse questions)(being self in self and other/s) into morality(being other/s in self or being self in self). That means any voter can question universal law. But no voter can rise above universal law. Pl.note that any public questioner goal is to be public solution which means being public question to public question within self. Simple ! Govt audit looks after itself. And people(individuals) will looks after their audit "by being in groups/laws/parties". Govt is party to all diverse parties.