East India Company became so powerful because British Parliament collude...
HISTORY WRITTEN OR TOLD HAD NEVER BEEN 'SOCIAL BEING PERSONAL TO PERSONAL'.
HUMAN HISTORY HAD ALWAYS BEEN 'PERSONAL BEING SOCIAL TO SOCIAL'.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IF ABOVE POINT IS KEPT IN MIND WHILE 'DISCUSSING' ABOUT IT,THEN 'DEBATES OF HISTORIANS AND HISTORY BOOKS ON SOCIAL MEDIA' will be MORE MEANINGFUL AND TRUTHFUL ATLEAST FROM NOW IN THIS KNOWLEDGE(SOCIAL)(LATERAL) AGE.
----------------------------------------------------------------
REGARDING ABOVE POINT THAT 'EAST INDIA COMPANY BECOMING POWERFUL BECAUSE THEN BRITISH PARLIAMENT COLLUDED WITH IT', HERE HISTORIAN WILLIAM DALRYMPLE CONVENIENTLY IGNORED TO MENTION THE OTHER SIDE OF STORY.
THE OTHER SIDE OF STORY IS THAT HERE IN INDIA THEN,INDIAN IMPERIALISTS LIKE INDIAN MAHARAJAHS AND SO ON WERE ALSO COLLUDERS WITH INDIAN PEOPLE THEN.
SO 'COLLUDING AGAINST COLLUDERS WHILE BEING ADVERSE WITH BEING ADVERSE' WAS NOT UNDEMOCRATIC TO EITHER EAST INDIA COMPANY OR BRITISH PARLIAMENT THEN TOWARDS NATURAL RIGHT TO BRITISH RULE IN INDIA.
PL.REMEMBER ! 'EVERY SUCCESSOR GOVERNANCE PREVAILS OVER ITS PREDECESSOR GOVERNANCE' ANYWHERE ANYTIME ON ANY PEOPLE.
AND MOREOVER,BRITISH RULERS IN INDIA ENSURED MY OWN INDIAN NATIONAL CONGRESS NURTURE AS 'NATURAL SUCCESSOR TO ALL ITS PREDECESSOR GOVTS THAT EXISTED TILL THEN THROUGHOUT INDIA'.
BECAUSE ANY EXPLOITING RULER/S WHO WERE GRANTING LIBERATION MUST ENSURE THAT THEIR DIGNITY SHOULD NOT GET DAMAGED THROUGHOUT WORLD EVEN AFTER LIBERATION TOWARDS BETTERMENT OF WORLD SOCIO-ECONOMICS WHICH IS GOAL OF LIBERATION.
----------------------------------------------------------------
BY ORDER,
RAMA.
HUMAN HISTORY HAD ALWAYS BEEN 'PERSONAL BEING SOCIAL TO SOCIAL'.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IF ABOVE POINT IS KEPT IN MIND WHILE 'DISCUSSING' ABOUT IT,THEN 'DEBATES OF HISTORIANS AND HISTORY BOOKS ON SOCIAL MEDIA' will be MORE MEANINGFUL AND TRUTHFUL ATLEAST FROM NOW IN THIS KNOWLEDGE(SOCIAL)(LATERAL) AGE.
----------------------------------------------------------------
REGARDING ABOVE POINT THAT 'EAST INDIA COMPANY BECOMING POWERFUL BECAUSE THEN BRITISH PARLIAMENT COLLUDED WITH IT', HERE HISTORIAN WILLIAM DALRYMPLE CONVENIENTLY IGNORED TO MENTION THE OTHER SIDE OF STORY.
THE OTHER SIDE OF STORY IS THAT HERE IN INDIA THEN,INDIAN IMPERIALISTS LIKE INDIAN MAHARAJAHS AND SO ON WERE ALSO COLLUDERS WITH INDIAN PEOPLE THEN.
SO 'COLLUDING AGAINST COLLUDERS WHILE BEING ADVERSE WITH BEING ADVERSE' WAS NOT UNDEMOCRATIC TO EITHER EAST INDIA COMPANY OR BRITISH PARLIAMENT THEN TOWARDS NATURAL RIGHT TO BRITISH RULE IN INDIA.
PL.REMEMBER ! 'EVERY SUCCESSOR GOVERNANCE PREVAILS OVER ITS PREDECESSOR GOVERNANCE' ANYWHERE ANYTIME ON ANY PEOPLE.
AND MOREOVER,BRITISH RULERS IN INDIA ENSURED MY OWN INDIAN NATIONAL CONGRESS NURTURE AS 'NATURAL SUCCESSOR TO ALL ITS PREDECESSOR GOVTS THAT EXISTED TILL THEN THROUGHOUT INDIA'.
BECAUSE ANY EXPLOITING RULER/S WHO WERE GRANTING LIBERATION MUST ENSURE THAT THEIR DIGNITY SHOULD NOT GET DAMAGED THROUGHOUT WORLD EVEN AFTER LIBERATION TOWARDS BETTERMENT OF WORLD SOCIO-ECONOMICS WHICH IS GOAL OF LIBERATION.
----------------------------------------------------------------
BY ORDER,
RAMA.
Comments