ROUND TABLE CONFERENCE AMBEDKAR VS GANDHI

ANY EQUALITY WHICH DOESN'T RESPECT INEQUALITY CAN NEVER BELIEVE IN TRUTH.

      TWO PERSONS TRYING TO SEARCH SAME TRUTH OFTEN REACH TWO DIFFERENT CONCLUSIONS.

       AN ARGUMENT TO PREVAIL AS BELIEF MUST GO THROUGH FLASH POINT BETWEEN 'FOR AND AGAINST' . 

     THAT MEANS AFTER ARGUMENTS WHICH IS 'TWO DIFFERENT CONCLUSIONS',AGAIN BOTH SIDES SHOULD BELIEVE IN 'TRUTH IS ONE BUT APPEARS AS TWO'.

     -----------------------------------------

    MY POINT IS SIMPLE.

    BOTH MAHATMA GANDHI AND BRITISH PREVAILED AS TRUE RIGHT AND GOOD AT NEXT.

    WHEREAS B R AMBEDKAR 'APPEARED TO BE' TRUE RIGHT AND GOOD AT NEXT.

    INCLUSIVE IDEOLOGY OF MAHATMA GANDHI PREVAILS OVER DIVISIVE IDEOLOGY OF B R AMBEDKAR.





BY ORDER,

RAMA(JESUS CHRIST SECOND COMING).