ROUND TABLE CONFERENCE AMBEDKAR VS GANDHI

ANY EQUALITY WHICH DOESN'T RESPECT INEQUALITY CAN NEVER BELIEVE IN TRUTH.

      TWO PERSONS TRYING TO SEARCH SAME TRUTH OFTEN REACH TWO DIFFERENT CONCLUSIONS.

       AN ARGUMENT TO PREVAIL AS BELIEF MUST GO THROUGH FLASH POINT BETWEEN 'FOR AND AGAINST' . 

     THAT MEANS AFTER ARGUMENTS WHICH IS 'TWO DIFFERENT CONCLUSIONS',AGAIN BOTH SIDES SHOULD BELIEVE IN 'TRUTH IS ONE BUT APPEARS AS TWO'.

     -----------------------------------------

    MY POINT IS SIMPLE.

    BOTH MAHATMA GANDHI AND BRITISH PREVAILED AS TRUE RIGHT AND GOOD AT NEXT.

    WHEREAS B R AMBEDKAR 'APPEARED TO BE' TRUE RIGHT AND GOOD AT NEXT.

    INCLUSIVE IDEOLOGY OF MAHATMA GANDHI PREVAILS OVER DIVISIVE IDEOLOGY OF B R AMBEDKAR.





BY ORDER,

RAMA(JESUS CHRIST SECOND COMING).  

       

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When there is no knowledge(which seeks self or sensible mindful voice)(literary words) to any mathematical or biochemical law,then it will be either self ignorance or social ignorance. So information thus obtained in other/s must be complexed(adverse) with self(sensible mindful voice) by applying one's mind on his/her mind again towards goal of equality(peace),love(retaining self as self in other/s) and truth(which solves deception appearance as deception can not stand against adverse questions). Law in universe is one. That law is being lawful only to lawful as society matures. And purpose of that universal law is to solve immorality(inconsistency against adverse questions)(being self in self and other/s) into morality(being other/s in self or being self in self). That means any voter can question universal law. But no voter can rise above universal law. Pl.note that any public questioner goal is to be public solution which means being public question to public question within self. Simple ! Govt audit looks after itself. And people(individuals) will looks after their audit "by being in groups/laws/parties". Govt is party to all diverse parties.