Security forces not letting us move, say Srinagar locals

TRUTH IS CERTAINLY NOT 'APPEARING RIGHT' AND/OR 'BEING RIGHT' AS ABOVE BUT 'MAKING BOTH EVERY SELF AND OTHER/S AS PREVAILING RIGHT BY APPEARING WRONG AGAINST APPEARING RIGHT AND BEING RIGHT'.

    TRUTH IS SOCIAL(KNOWLEDGE) WHICH HAS FOUR SIDES.

     SO UNTIL AND UNLESS INDIA DOESN'T BECOME SOCIAL BEING PERSONAL FROM PRESENT PERSONAL BEING SOCIAL,KASHMIR SEPARATISM ISSUE WHICH IS SOCIO-POLITICAL,SOCIO-ECONOMIC,SOCIO-RELIGIOUS AND SOCIO-LEGAL COMPLEXITIES OF 'THE WHOLE WORLD AND INDIA' CAN NOT GET SOLVED.

       PL.NOTE THAT GOVTS CAN NOT SOLVE SEPARATISM ISSUES. 

    ONLY ITS PEOPLE IN THIS DEMOCRATIC WORLD SOCIETY CAN SOLVE THEMSELVES INTO PREVAILING AS TRUE ABOUT THEIR NATIONALITY. 

     BUT GOVTS OF THE LAND CAN CERTAINLY FACILITATE SOLUTION FOR SEPARATISM ISSUE.  

     AND ONE MORE POINT ON KASHMIR SEPARATISM ISSUE ! UNITED NATIONS RESOLUTIONS AND CONVENTIONS WHICH MUST BE RESPECTED ON KASHMIR ARE ALREADY THERE.

     SOVEREIGNITY OF INDIA ON KASHMIR IS EXISTING ONLY AFTER KASHMIR ACCESSION TO INDIA.IN OTHER WORDS TO SAY AS PAKISTAN WAS ALL ALONG ARGUING ABOUT KASHMIR,IF KASHMIR DID NOT AGREE FOR ITS ACCESSION AS INDIAN STATE TO INDIA,SOVEREIGNITY OF INDIA WAS NOT BEING EXISTED ON KASHMIR SOIL. KASHMIR ACCESSION AS INDIAN STATE TO INDIA WAS ONLY UNDER CERTAIN CONDITIONS.

    SO TALKS WITH KASHMIRI ALL-PARTY LEADERS AS WELL AS PAKISTANI GOVT AND UNITED NATIONS IS COMPULSORY 'FOR BETTER WORLD ORDER'.

   ANY PERMANENT SOLUTION ANYWHERE SHOULD NOT BE FORCED SOLUTION BY GOVT SHEER WILL.

   ---------------------------------------

   MY POINT IS SIMPLE.

   ONLY SOCIETY AT ULTIMATE CAN AND WILL DECIDE BOTH KASHMIR ISSUE AND BABRI-MASJID-AYODHYA-RAM-JANMABHUMI-ISSUE.      

   NO AMOUNT OF GOVTS AND COURTS CAN NOT SOLVE BOTH.

   YES ! ALL PRESENT GOVTS THROUGHOUT WORLD ARE ANTISOCIAL GOVTS. AND ALL GOVTS THROUGHOUT WORLD HAVE TO BECOME SOCIAL WHICH MEANS 'APPEARING DIFFERENT BEING SAME TO SAME' FROM PRESENT ANTISOCIAL WHICH MEANS 'APPEARING SAME TO SAME BEING DIFFERENT'.

    ASKING VOTE/S BY SUBSCRIBING OTHER/S IS ANTISOCIAL.

    DESERVING VOTE/S FOR SELF IS SOCIAL.

    WORLD IS CHANGING INTO TRUE.

    SO WAIT AND WATCH FOR PREVAILANCE AT ULTIMATE THAN PRECIPITATING MATTERS FOR WORSE !  


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When there is no knowledge(which seeks self or sensible mindful voice)(literary words) to any mathematical or biochemical law,then it will be either self ignorance or social ignorance. So information thus obtained in other/s must be complexed(adverse) with self(sensible mindful voice) by applying one's mind on his/her mind again towards goal of equality(peace),love(retaining self as self in other/s) and truth(which solves deception appearance as deception can not stand against adverse questions). Law in universe is one. That law is being lawful only to lawful as society matures. And purpose of that universal law is to solve immorality(inconsistency against adverse questions)(being self in self and other/s) into morality(being other/s in self or being self in self). That means any voter can question universal law. But no voter can rise above universal law. Pl.note that any public questioner goal is to be public solution which means being public question to public question within self. Simple ! Govt audit looks after itself. And people(individuals) will looks after their audit "by being in groups/laws/parties". Govt is party to all diverse parties.