What do Russians think of Stalin? - BBC News

THERE ARE TWO WAYS TO EXPLAIN A LEADER. 1.'PERSONAL BEING SOCIAL' WHICH MEANS SEEING LEADER FROM THEIR NATION ANGLE. AND 2. ' SOCIAL BEING PERSONAL' WHICH MEANS SEEING LEADER FROM WORLD ANGLE.

    MY POINT IS THAT ONE IS ANSWERED AS MUCH HE ASKED. AS MEDIA IS ASKING,ANSWER WILL BE FROM MEDIA ANGLE WHICH IS 'PERSONAL BEING SOCIAL' ANGLE ONLY.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When there is no knowledge(which seeks self or sensible mindful voice)(literary words) to any mathematical or biochemical law,then it will be either self ignorance or social ignorance. So information thus obtained in other/s must be complexed(adverse) with self(sensible mindful voice) by applying one's mind on his/her mind again towards goal of equality(peace),love(retaining self as self in other/s) and truth(which solves deception appearance as deception can not stand against adverse questions). Law in universe is one. That law is being lawful only to lawful as society matures. And purpose of that universal law is to solve immorality(inconsistency against adverse questions)(being self in self and other/s) into morality(being other/s in self or being self in self). That means any voter can question universal law. But no voter can rise above universal law. Pl.note that any public questioner goal is to be public solution which means being public question to public question within self. Simple ! Govt audit looks after itself. And people(individuals) will looks after their audit "by being in groups/laws/parties". Govt is party to all diverse parties.