Gandhis Two mistakes
COUNTING MISTAKES IS WORK OF DEVIL'S MIND.
MY QUESTIONS TO 'ABOVE SO-CALLED INTELLECTUAL' QUESTIONS WILL BE ANSWERS.
MY FIRST QUESTION IS 'WHY HE IS 'JUST BEING LAW' WHICH IS ALSO 'LAWFUL BECOMING?'.Because india 'is/has to be/will be' social which means being lawful only lawful.There 'was' no political india before independence even though appearing so.
People may follow/listen 'but never believe to obey(except during the present end times) lawful becomings' as people need be both personal "which means social to social" and social "which means personal to personal".
MY NEXT QUESTION TO ABOVE SO-CALLED INTELLECTUAL IS 'CAN HE EXPLAIN HOW DEMOCRATIC INDEPENDENT INDIA WILL OVERCOME 'ANARCHY PREVAILANCE OVER SENSE' WITHOUT CENTRALISED STRENGTH OF PANDIT NEHRU DYNASTY AT TOPMOST LEVEL OVER 70 YEARS FOR SUCCESS IN TRUTH AT ULTIMATE?'
CAN'T ABOVE GENTLEMAN-INTELLECTUAL JUDGE HIMSELF AS DIVISIVE-CENTRIC IN GOVERNANCE
AT INDIAN TOP LEVEL?
IF DEMOCRATIC FREE INDIA WAS BEING AS PER ABOVE GENTLEMAN DREAMS,THEN INDIA WAS DISINTEGRATED INTO MANY NATIONS LONG TIME AGO.TO AVERT INDIAN DISINTEGRATION THROUGH ABOVE GENTLEMAN ANARCHY PREVAILANCE ,BRITISH DIVIDED INDIA INTO INDIA AND PAKISTAN WHILE ISLAMIC PAKISTAN WAS UNABLE TO BE UNITED TO GET DIVIDED AGAIN INTO PAKISTAN AND BANGLADESH.
--------------------------
ONE THING CROPS UP INTO MY MIND THAT ABOVE GENTLEMAN CAN BE BEST SUITED TO JOB OF INDIAN POLICE CONSTABLE AND NOTHING MORE THAN THAT.
ABOVE GENTLEMAN MADE WORD 'INDIAN PROFESSOR' AS MISNOMER LIKE MOST OTHER PROFESSORS IN SCIENCE DEPTS EXCEPT SOCIOLOGY REVELLED TO BE SO.
MY QUESTIONS TO 'ABOVE SO-CALLED INTELLECTUAL' QUESTIONS WILL BE ANSWERS.
MY FIRST QUESTION IS 'WHY HE IS 'JUST BEING LAW' WHICH IS ALSO 'LAWFUL BECOMING?'.Because india 'is/has to be/will be' social which means being lawful only lawful.There 'was' no political india before independence even though appearing so.
People may follow/listen 'but never believe to obey(except during the present end times) lawful becomings' as people need be both personal "which means social to social" and social "which means personal to personal".
MY NEXT QUESTION TO ABOVE SO-CALLED INTELLECTUAL IS 'CAN HE EXPLAIN HOW DEMOCRATIC INDEPENDENT INDIA WILL OVERCOME 'ANARCHY PREVAILANCE OVER SENSE' WITHOUT CENTRALISED STRENGTH OF PANDIT NEHRU DYNASTY AT TOPMOST LEVEL OVER 70 YEARS FOR SUCCESS IN TRUTH AT ULTIMATE?'
CAN'T ABOVE GENTLEMAN-INTELLECTUAL JUDGE HIMSELF AS DIVISIVE-CENTRIC IN GOVERNANCE
AT INDIAN TOP LEVEL?
IF DEMOCRATIC FREE INDIA WAS BEING AS PER ABOVE GENTLEMAN DREAMS,THEN INDIA WAS DISINTEGRATED INTO MANY NATIONS LONG TIME AGO.TO AVERT INDIAN DISINTEGRATION THROUGH ABOVE GENTLEMAN ANARCHY PREVAILANCE ,BRITISH DIVIDED INDIA INTO INDIA AND PAKISTAN WHILE ISLAMIC PAKISTAN WAS UNABLE TO BE UNITED TO GET DIVIDED AGAIN INTO PAKISTAN AND BANGLADESH.
--------------------------
ONE THING CROPS UP INTO MY MIND THAT ABOVE GENTLEMAN CAN BE BEST SUITED TO JOB OF INDIAN POLICE CONSTABLE AND NOTHING MORE THAN THAT.
ABOVE GENTLEMAN MADE WORD 'INDIAN PROFESSOR' AS MISNOMER LIKE MOST OTHER PROFESSORS IN SCIENCE DEPTS EXCEPT SOCIOLOGY REVELLED TO BE SO.
Comments