PM Narendra Modi Vs Rahul Gandhi - Both Facing Mic problem Comparison
THERE MUST BE SENSE PREVAILANCE.
HOW CAN MEDIAPERSONS BE RIGHT AND GOOD IN BELIEVING "BOTH ANTI-CONGRESS RULE NOW AND ANTI-CONGRESS OPPOSITION THEN" BECAUSE SAME INDIAN PEOPLE(MEDIA SUBSCRIBERS) VOTED FOR BOTH PRESENT ANTI-CONGRESS RULE AND PAST CONGRESS RULE ?
MEDIA BLUNDER IN PUBLIC CREDIBILITY IS THAT TWIST AND TURN ARE NOT SAME IN BOTH MAGNITUDE AND DIRECTION. THAT IS WHY SOCIAL NETWORKING LIKE FACEBOOK AND SO ON... ARE GAINING PUBLIC CREDIBILITY OVER PROFESSIONAL MEDIAPERSONS.
SO MY LOGIC IS THAT MEDIAPERSONS SHOULD ATLEAST CHANGE THEIR MINDSET NOW INTO "PRO-GOVT MIND BEING ANTI-GOVT SENSE" FROM THEIR PRESENT "ANTI-GOVT MIND BEING PRO-GOVT SENSE".
OR ELSE MEDIAPERSONS WILL BE MADE TO CHANGE THEIR MIND SO BY GOVT(OTHER/S) SOONER OR LATER.
MEDIA SHOULD NEVER THINK THAT MEDIAPERSONS ARE ABOVE LAW-MAKING GOVT OF THE LAND "EVEN THOUGH MEDIAPERSONS ARE SUPPOSED TO ENJOY FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION IN DEMOCRATIC WORLD SYSTEM'.
I DON'T THINK THAT MEDIAPERSONS CONTRIBUTED THEIR MIGHT TO SOCIAL-GOODNESS FOR PAST 70 YEARS OF INDIAN INDEPENDENCE.
THAT IS WHY INDIAN NATIONAL CONGRESS FOR PAST 70 YEARS DIDN'T SHED ITS 'IMPERIALISM PREVAILANCE'.
HOW CAN MEDIAPERSONS BE RIGHT AND GOOD IN BELIEVING "BOTH ANTI-CONGRESS RULE NOW AND ANTI-CONGRESS OPPOSITION THEN" BECAUSE SAME INDIAN PEOPLE(MEDIA SUBSCRIBERS) VOTED FOR BOTH PRESENT ANTI-CONGRESS RULE AND PAST CONGRESS RULE ?
MEDIA BLUNDER IN PUBLIC CREDIBILITY IS THAT TWIST AND TURN ARE NOT SAME IN BOTH MAGNITUDE AND DIRECTION. THAT IS WHY SOCIAL NETWORKING LIKE FACEBOOK AND SO ON... ARE GAINING PUBLIC CREDIBILITY OVER PROFESSIONAL MEDIAPERSONS.
SO MY LOGIC IS THAT MEDIAPERSONS SHOULD ATLEAST CHANGE THEIR MINDSET NOW INTO "PRO-GOVT MIND BEING ANTI-GOVT SENSE" FROM THEIR PRESENT "ANTI-GOVT MIND BEING PRO-GOVT SENSE".
OR ELSE MEDIAPERSONS WILL BE MADE TO CHANGE THEIR MIND SO BY GOVT(OTHER/S) SOONER OR LATER.
MEDIA SHOULD NEVER THINK THAT MEDIAPERSONS ARE ABOVE LAW-MAKING GOVT OF THE LAND "EVEN THOUGH MEDIAPERSONS ARE SUPPOSED TO ENJOY FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION IN DEMOCRATIC WORLD SYSTEM'.
I DON'T THINK THAT MEDIAPERSONS CONTRIBUTED THEIR MIGHT TO SOCIAL-GOODNESS FOR PAST 70 YEARS OF INDIAN INDEPENDENCE.
THAT IS WHY INDIAN NATIONAL CONGRESS FOR PAST 70 YEARS DIDN'T SHED ITS 'IMPERIALISM PREVAILANCE'.
Comments