Arnab Goswami Speaks To Prof PK Basu On Confronting Rahul Gandhi
SEE ! Respected Prof.P K BASU ! Respected Arnab goswami!
1).YOU BOTH ARE NOT PUBLIC LEADERS(MAIN OPPOSITION PARLIAMENTARY PARTY LEADERS) LIKE RAHUL GANDHI who seeks public verdict always.SO SUBJECTIVITY HINDERS THAT YOU BOTH SHOULD NOT THINK YOU BOTH ARE EQUAL LEVEL WITH RAHUL GANDHI WHO BELONGS TO "LEGISLATURE WHICH IS SUPREME THAN EXECUTIVE(ADMINSTRATION),JUDICIARY AND FOUTH ESTATE".
2). YOU BOTH IGNORE THAT 'QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS WHICH IS LAW IS SUBSERVIENT TO QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS WHICH IS KNOWLEDGE(SOCIAL)'.SO RAHUL GANDHI IS BEING SAME IGNORANT TO YOU SAME IGNORANTS.
ALL THINGS IN WORLD DON'T OBEY QUESTIONS & ANSWERS but obey sense(which prevails).
ANY Q & A MUST OBEY SENSE THAT "PREVAILS AT NEXT".
SO MEDIA AND ACADEMIC COMMUNITY GO ON WINNING ARGUMENTS WHEREAS POLITICIANS GO ON WINNING SENSE WHICH HAS ULTIMATE PREVAILANCE.
ENDS JUSTIFY MEANS "BUT NOT JUST APPEARING JUSTIFY SO".
SO NOBODY CARES TO BELIEVE IN MEDIA ARGUMENTS AND ACADEMICIANS CERTIFICATES.
BUT EVERYBODY BELIEVES IN ONE'S SOCIAL BRILLIANCE THAN ACADEMIC BRILLIANCE.
VOTE IS SACRED BUT NOT NOTE(which is sought by media and academicians).
BOOK WRITING by name AND MEDIA TRAILS by name ARE "NOT SOCIAL BEING BUT FOR SOCIAL APPEARANCE AND DIGNITY".
RESPECT IS NOT BELIEF.
RESPECT IS SOCIAL APPEARANCE.
BELIEF IN SOCIAL BEING AND PREVAILING AT ULTIMATE SUCCESS IN TRUTH.
=============
RESPECT IS ACADEMICIANS AND MEDIA.
BELIEF IS PUBLIC PARLIAMENTARY LEADERSHIP AT THE NEXT(ULTIMATE).
---------------------------
MEDIA AND ACADEMICIANS MAY DISSEMENATE OCEAN OF KNOWLEDGE THROUGH WORDS AND ARGUMENTS.BUT TRUE KNOWLEDGE IS BEING SOME IN ALL WORDS by name.AND PUBLIC PARLIAMENTS AND THEIR LEADERS ARE 'PRIVILEGED' BECAUSE OF THEIR TRUE SELF-KNOWLEDGE of course which appears or is being bitter to prevail as sweet at next(ultimate).
Pl.find difference between knowledge and its application of mind.
Knowledge is media and academicians.
Its application of mind is law makers.
Because of glamour and power vested with law makers,media(anarchists) and academicians(reactionaries) wish to aspire to become law makers 'but not vice versa'.
1).YOU BOTH ARE NOT PUBLIC LEADERS(MAIN OPPOSITION PARLIAMENTARY PARTY LEADERS) LIKE RAHUL GANDHI who seeks public verdict always.SO SUBJECTIVITY HINDERS THAT YOU BOTH SHOULD NOT THINK YOU BOTH ARE EQUAL LEVEL WITH RAHUL GANDHI WHO BELONGS TO "LEGISLATURE WHICH IS SUPREME THAN EXECUTIVE(ADMINSTRATION),JUDICIARY AND FOUTH ESTATE".
2). YOU BOTH IGNORE THAT 'QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS WHICH IS LAW IS SUBSERVIENT TO QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS WHICH IS KNOWLEDGE(SOCIAL)'.SO RAHUL GANDHI IS BEING SAME IGNORANT TO YOU SAME IGNORANTS.
ALL THINGS IN WORLD DON'T OBEY QUESTIONS & ANSWERS but obey sense(which prevails).
ANY Q & A MUST OBEY SENSE THAT "PREVAILS AT NEXT".
SO MEDIA AND ACADEMIC COMMUNITY GO ON WINNING ARGUMENTS WHEREAS POLITICIANS GO ON WINNING SENSE WHICH HAS ULTIMATE PREVAILANCE.
ENDS JUSTIFY MEANS "BUT NOT JUST APPEARING JUSTIFY SO".
SO NOBODY CARES TO BELIEVE IN MEDIA ARGUMENTS AND ACADEMICIANS CERTIFICATES.
BUT EVERYBODY BELIEVES IN ONE'S SOCIAL BRILLIANCE THAN ACADEMIC BRILLIANCE.
VOTE IS SACRED BUT NOT NOTE(which is sought by media and academicians).
BOOK WRITING by name AND MEDIA TRAILS by name ARE "NOT SOCIAL BEING BUT FOR SOCIAL APPEARANCE AND DIGNITY".
RESPECT IS NOT BELIEF.
RESPECT IS SOCIAL APPEARANCE.
BELIEF IN SOCIAL BEING AND PREVAILING AT ULTIMATE SUCCESS IN TRUTH.
=============
RESPECT IS ACADEMICIANS AND MEDIA.
BELIEF IS PUBLIC PARLIAMENTARY LEADERSHIP AT THE NEXT(ULTIMATE).
---------------------------
MEDIA AND ACADEMICIANS MAY DISSEMENATE OCEAN OF KNOWLEDGE THROUGH WORDS AND ARGUMENTS.BUT TRUE KNOWLEDGE IS BEING SOME IN ALL WORDS by name.AND PUBLIC PARLIAMENTS AND THEIR LEADERS ARE 'PRIVILEGED' BECAUSE OF THEIR TRUE SELF-KNOWLEDGE of course which appears or is being bitter to prevail as sweet at next(ultimate).
Pl.find difference between knowledge and its application of mind.
Knowledge is media and academicians.
Its application of mind is law makers.
Because of glamour and power vested with law makers,media(anarchists) and academicians(reactionaries) wish to aspire to become law makers 'but not vice versa'.
Comments