Vaisya(tamo-rajas) is wise among all four Varnams. Vaisya(tamo-rajas) doesn't believe in argument which is 100% precise. Rather vaisya(tamo-rajas) believes in "99.999% precise by 100% precise" so that he/she can deserve profit over and above person who is 100%. precise. M k Gandhi is tamo-rajas whereas myself is satva-rajas. M k Gandhi is experimentalist with truth(power). Whereas myself is experimentalist with plural(many) philosophies, isn't it ?

వాదన అనేది నమ్మే అంశము కాదు .
వాదన అనేది గౌరవము యొక్క అంశము .
వాదన అనేది ఆలోచన (మాట )(ఊహ ,వివరణ మరియు హృదయము ) యొక్క అంశము .
వాదన అనేది ఆలోచన కు మార్గము .
వాదన అనేది గమ్యము కాదు .
--------
వాదన అనేది 100% పెర్ఫెక్ట్ గా ఉండటము వలన జరుగును .
అయితే వాదన ను నమ్మే వాడు 100% పెర్ఫెక్ట్ గా "నిలువడము " జరుగదు .

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When there is no knowledge(which seeks self or sensible mindful voice)(literary words) to any mathematical or biochemical law,then it will be either self ignorance or social ignorance. So information thus obtained in other/s must be complexed(adverse) with self(sensible mindful voice) by applying one's mind on his/her mind again towards goal of equality(peace),love(retaining self as self in other/s) and truth(which solves deception appearance as deception can not stand against adverse questions). Law in universe is one. That law is being lawful only to lawful as society matures. And purpose of that universal law is to solve immorality(inconsistency against adverse questions)(being self in self and other/s) into morality(being other/s in self or being self in self). That means any voter can question universal law. But no voter can rise above universal law. Pl.note that any public questioner goal is to be public solution which means being public question to public question within self. Simple ! Govt audit looks after itself. And people(individuals) will looks after their audit "by being in groups/laws/parties". Govt is party to all diverse parties.