O factionists,indian maoists and TDP ! O rowdies,indian police and YSRCP ! THIS IS ONE-TO-ONE WORLD being one world. SO IF YOU CONTINUE TO BE "REALISED.SELF IN SELF" which is half-truth,YOU ARE BOUND TO FACE ADVERSARIES IN ONE FORM OR OTHER which may be law court judges,indian police or political group enemies or health enemies within. MY POINT IS WHEN YOU ARE BEING SELF IN SELF,YOUR INTERVIEWER MUST BE ASKING YOU TO BE SELF IN SOCIAL. It has become fashion for those who are giving interviews to ask media interviewers "to be followers". MEDIA HAS EVERY RIGHT TO BE FREE FROM THOSE WHO ARE GIVING INTERVIEWS. Media can be and has to be.pervert-minded. But media should not be "wishful thinking" or "ego-minded". ONLY ECCENTRIC QUESTIONS BY MEDIA CAN MAKE ITS INTERVIEWEES AS PUBLIC RESPONSIBLE. Public influence or public power is not enjoyment but duty. So media always has to make public influenctials and public powerfuls to be on tenterhooks. Otherwise there is no meaning of democratic freedom of expression. But remember ! Pervert-mind duty is right while wishful thinking duty or ego-minded duty is crime. Maintain fine difference. Media has to right to "examine public people" but should not stoop to "abuse or question public people" because public people are not answerable to media but to public ultimately. EXAMINING IS OUT OF EXAMINING PUBLIC PERSON FREE WILL. ABUSING OR QUESTIONING PUBLIC PERSON IS TRESPASSING INTO PUBLIC PERSON DUTY. Write down questions and double-check questions before asking so that media and public people enjoy their its own freedom(duty) of their subscribers and their public respectively.

నకారాత్మకతగా కనిపించాలి కానీ చూడటము అనేది అసాంఘికత .
అయితే సకారాత్మకత గా ఉంటేనే నకారాత్మకత గా కనిపించే అధికారము ఉంటుంది .
మనము కనిపించేది ఎదుటి వారి కళ్ళకు మాత్రమే .
మనము చూసేది మన కళ్ళకు మాత్రమే .
మనము కనిపించేది అనే హ్యూమన్ ఫ్యాకల్టీకి మరియు మనము చూసేది అనే హ్యూమన్ ఫ్యాకల్టీ కి తేడా ఉంది కదా !
------------