MORAL IS THAT LITIGANT/S(TELANGANA) SHOULD PREVAIL OVER SENSIBLE/S(AP) IN ADMINSTRATION LOOPHOLE.

Present political situation in AP and telangana states gave 3 important points.
1.HOW CAN law court/s role in mature society not  as judgements by media,govt/s and public-police have gained legality.
2.HOW CAN AP state govt not be criminal if an accused in criminal case of one state(TELANGANA) govt like mathiah can be lawful of another state govt(AP).?
3.HOW CAN central govt interfere between issue between litigant telangana CM and sensible AP CM?

    

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When there is no knowledge(which seeks self or sensible mindful voice)(literary words) to any mathematical or biochemical law,then it will be either self ignorance or social ignorance. So information thus obtained in other/s must be complexed(adverse) with self(sensible mindful voice) by applying one's mind on his/her mind again towards goal of equality(peace),love(retaining self as self in other/s) and truth(which solves deception appearance as deception can not stand against adverse questions). Law in universe is one. That law is being lawful only to lawful as society matures. And purpose of that universal law is to solve immorality(inconsistency against adverse questions)(being self in self and other/s) into morality(being other/s in self or being self in self). That means any voter can question universal law. But no voter can rise above universal law. Pl.note that any public questioner goal is to be public solution which means being public question to public question within self. Simple ! Govt audit looks after itself. And people(individuals) will looks after their audit "by being in groups/laws/parties". Govt is party to all diverse parties.