Actor Sivaji emotional speech on AP state bifurication





     POLITICS IS NOT SENTIMENT BUT "BY" RIGHT(good)-SENTIMENT(feeling).

     At present(the end of part two),feeling for hyderabad and united andhrapradesh state is not right feeling.

     At the last moment in race for truth(power),refereee verdict on telangana should be in favour of winner but not in favour of runner-up.If any of stake-holders of verdict DOESN'T LIKE REFEREE VERDICT,he/she may GO FOR VERDICT ON THAT PARTICULAR COUNT "IN COMING PUBLIC ELECTION" by contesting against referee(ruling party) ONLY ON THAT PARTICULAR DECISION TO BE PRECISE.

    If not so above,ACTOR SIVAJI MUST SHUT-UP MOUTH IN PRESENT SOCIAL-DEMOCRACY AS MATURE-GUY.Or else,I need appeal to HONOURABLE telangana MPs & MLAs as well as osmania university students in telangana state to file nuisance case against actor sivaji.   

     I HOPE ACTOR SIVAJI SAY "JAI TELANGANA" AND "JAI SEEMA-ANDHRA" IMMEDIATELY.

------------------------------------------------

      TO ACTOR SIVAJI,

          I AM FOLLOWING YOUR SOCIAL VIDEOS ON YOUTUBE.TAKE CARE ABOUT HEALTH.BE CAREFUL ABOUT PUBLIC NUISANCE LAW.

         'FREEDOM' OF EXPRESSION IS 'DUTY'.

          ONE'S FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION STOPS 'AT WHERE' THE OTHER STARTS ASSERTING HIS/HER FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION.

      DON'T CROSS LIMITS.

-------------------------------------------------           



kota sri nivasa rao

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When there is no knowledge(which seeks self or sensible mindful voice)(literary words) to any mathematical or biochemical law,then it will be either self ignorance or social ignorance. So information thus obtained in other/s must be complexed(adverse) with self(sensible mindful voice) by applying one's mind on his/her mind again towards goal of equality(peace),love(retaining self as self in other/s) and truth(which solves deception appearance as deception can not stand against adverse questions). Law in universe is one. That law is being lawful only to lawful as society matures. And purpose of that universal law is to solve immorality(inconsistency against adverse questions)(being self in self and other/s) into morality(being other/s in self or being self in self). That means any voter can question universal law. But no voter can rise above universal law. Pl.note that any public questioner goal is to be public solution which means being public question to public question within self. Simple ! Govt audit looks after itself. And people(individuals) will looks after their audit "by being in groups/laws/parties". Govt is party to all diverse parties.