Discussion with Vundavalli Arun Kumar on Debate of T Bill in Assembly pa...

     Discussion/argument in legislative assemblies/parliament is 'just within party policy decisions framework'.

     Indian democracy is party democracy but not personal freedom.

    Discussion/argument as OPPOSING INDIVIDUAL either within social group or in legislative assemblies/parliament is criminal.

--------------------------------------------------

    1.DISCUSSION ON SUBJECT FOR MORAL QUALITY AS OPPOSING INDIVIDUAL IS LEGAL ONLY IN CLASSROOM OF 40.

    2.ARGUMENT ON SUBJECT FOR MORAL FEELING AS OPPOSING INDIVIDUAL IS LEGAL ONLY IN COURT-HALL.

--------------------------------------------------

    Personal discussion on issue of public nature in professional media is illegal.

   Personal argument on issue of public nature in legislature houses or parliament houses is illegal.

-------------------------------------------------

    Discussion and argument have place-sensitiveness and situation-sensitiveness among people.

-------------------------------------------------

    Pseudoism,hypothesis,hypocracy and psychophancy need be avoided by ANY LEADER WHO IS IN ELECTORAL POLITICS even though people are believing in pseudoism,hypothesis,hypocracy and psychophancy.



   SO UNDAVALLI ARUN KUMAR MUST SHUT-UP HIS MOUTH AS HE HAS TO MAINTAIN DECORUM AND DECENCY OF MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT  EVEN IF'UNCONSTITUTIONAL'MEDIA ARE ASKING IRRESPONSIBLE AND SELFISH-CONVINIENT QUESTIONS.



kota sri nivasa rao