Whether I am the power of truth or in the power of truth?

I am an english language favourite.
Ugly of ugly is favourite.

I am a nutrition favourite.

I am the world ruler.  
So I am simple and ideal who doesn't own car or phone.

I use information technology.
I apply thought and voice 

I being social judge allow tweeting on both myself and others.
Tweeting has value in resolution of cases.

I read human history with belief.
I read mythology with respect.

But interchanging respect and belief;moral and legal;personal and social is criminal.

There is no human being till date on earth who is ignorant at both heart(sense) and voice(mind). 

33% law-ignorants are illegal at heart and legal at voice.
10% social-ignorants are legal at heart and illegal at voice.

ONLY BY WRITING WHAT ONE THINKS ABOUT OTHER/S,ONE CAN BE RIGHT. 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When there is no knowledge(which seeks self or sensible mindful voice)(literary words) to any mathematical or biochemical law,then it will be either self ignorance or social ignorance. So information thus obtained in other/s must be complexed(adverse) with self(sensible mindful voice) by applying one's mind on his/her mind again towards goal of equality(peace),love(retaining self as self in other/s) and truth(which solves deception appearance as deception can not stand against adverse questions). Law in universe is one. That law is being lawful only to lawful as society matures. And purpose of that universal law is to solve immorality(inconsistency against adverse questions)(being self in self and other/s) into morality(being other/s in self or being self in self). That means any voter can question universal law. But no voter can rise above universal law. Pl.note that any public questioner goal is to be public solution which means being public question to public question within self. Simple ! Govt audit looks after itself. And people(individuals) will looks after their audit "by being in groups/laws/parties". Govt is party to all diverse parties.