SAYING NEGATIVE TO OTHER/S NEGATIVE IS POSITIVE TO PREVAIL NEGATIVE FOR SOLVING OTHER/S NEGATIVITY.

TRUTH(POWER) IS "BITTER"  TO BE "SWEET" AND SIMPLE AT LAST. AND EVERYBODY IS IN SEARCH OF HIS/HER OWN  TRUTH(POWER). As k m munshi(bharatiya vidya bhavan) wrote in his book "bhagavadgita and modern life","TRUTH IS HIGHLY SUBJECTIVE.TWO PERSONS SEARCHING FOR SAME TRUTH OFTEN COME TO TWO DIFFERENT CONCLUSIONS".

    Supposing that prakash raj has malafide intention like gagging on something in telugu film industry,why didn't srinu vaitla,directors association and movie artists association avoid controversy against " litigant mind or litigant thinker like prakash raj" by talking with prakash raj extensively and intensively?    Srinu vaitla!  No excuses pl.You should have avoided precipitation of professional  matters  u pto the  point of coming before media.    Here is an  unbalanced controversy at which  one actor on one side as well as  one director and his  dir ectors association on other side.    EVERYBODY WANTS JUSTICE IN SOME INSTANCE OR OTHER  WHETHER   HE/SHE IS  AGG REIVED OR MALAFIED IN CASE OF CONTROVERSY ARISED/CREATED.    Srinu vaitla should have prevented professional litigancy.    A film director as member of directors association should have learnt publ...

   తెలంగాణా    రాష్ట్రాన్ని !