How can using public imagination be fundamental right called freedom of expression and freedom of assembly ? Is there lot of difference between using public imagination and being public imagination to public imagination ? Is it called state when it's people are talking like prime ministers of India ? Will it lead to truth when people are using public imagination than being public imagination to public imagination ? Using public imagination is being in jail. Being public imagination to public imagination is being in society. SELF-DECEPTION APPEARS AS SELF-TRUTH. Any knowledge when realised should yield fruits of action. If people are talking like prime ministers of India in present democracy,will they be able to get things done in govt ? If not,why should people talk like prime ministers of India ? Is it not escapism,regression and pessimism among people to talk like prime ministers of India every now and then ? Pl.analyse.