Gyroscope means character.
Posts
Socially right character like Nara Chandrababu which prevails as personally wrong character can never make public as personally right character people. Because one can never give what is not within self to other/s. And one generally speaks more about thing which he/she didn't possess. BUT WILL NARA CHANDRA BABU LISTEN THAT HE CAN BE BAD AGAINST BAD "BUT CAN NEVER BE GOOD AGAINST BAD AT FIRST" which means personally right character ? No ! Those who are polticiallly suicidal will be naturally socially right character. Nobody can help wife seller and gambler Nara Chandrababu Naidu.
To understand world affairs,one needs good(consistent) personality and right perspective about world. Otherwise he/she is not supposed to read/discuss/practise politics. Isn't it ? So my point is that those who teach about how to speak must limit themselves to classrooms(seat of learning) while those who speak about how to make self and other/s speak must limit themselves to seat of power(truth). If you speak truth,you can't make other/s learn and pass in subject exam. If you speak fact,then you can't make other/s stay true. That is kota srinivasarao logic.
Pakistan didn't exist before 1947 AD. When British rulers are implementing two-nation theory while granting Indian(socio-political) independence,problem of Muslim majority Jammu & Kashmir people unification with Indian union came up. Then British rulers left those integration problems of Indian princely states TO WILL OF BOTH INDIAN AND PAKISTANI LEADERSHIP. Naturally that unification of Jammu & Kashmir dispute went to UNITED NATIONS IN 1948 AD. UN passed resolution on status issue of Jammu & Kashmir in 1948 AD that people of Jammu & Kashmir state should decide themselves whether they want to be unified with Indian union or separate from India "while asking paksitani troops completely withdraw from Jammu & Kashmir and conducting plebiscite under Indian troops". But Indian govt then under pandit Nehru granted Jammu & Kashmir its own constitution to be governed "as compensation for stay of Indian troops on Jammu & Kashmir soil" in the form of article 367 of Indian constitution "while constitution adoption by Indian parliament". But bjp(sectarian thinkers) made Jammu & Kashmir issue as national issue of patriotism "by forceful process without any democratic will to prevail". Bjp made seat of power(rule) as seat of learning "for its selfish ends" in Indian polity through intelligent articulation about govt as Hindu rashtra. So naturally paksitan takes up Kashmir issue by supporting Jammu & Kashmir people through demanding implementation of UN resolution 1948 which seeks plebiscite as and when Kashmiris demand separation. There is nothing wrong on part of paksitan to give moral support to Kashmiris as Indian govt kept its armed forces in Kashmir without honouring UN resolution 1948 to conduct plebiscite on separatism by just granting ey-wash article 367 in Indian constitution. Naturally Kashmiris agitate about separation as and when they felt alienated against their democratic will prevailance. But bjp makes Kashmir issue as national issue for its selfish political gains against Indian national congress and then PM pandit Nehru. Pandit Nehru politics on Jammu & Kashmir by granting Kashmir its own constitution within framework of Indian constitution "are being USED by Indian reactionaries who are greedy on Kashmir and its people will "for their survival fight against Indian national congress and paksitan. But fox-designs of bjp will be made self-eliminate by itself through paksitan opposition and Indian national congress opposition for success in truth(power) which is at the ultimate. SIMPLE ! Vested issue will be made vexed again till the ultimate "towards making solution as simple and get resolved by itself". That vexing of vexed issue in politics should not be seen with short-sighted mind by anybody. If anybody sees vexing vexed issue in short-sighted mind,then he/she will only get drowned in human memory and history as "those who are being democratic(agitated) to prevail as mediocre(imperial) vanish by their violent,ignonimous and rotten-minded death". Natural of death reveals nature of life of person. One may cheat other/s. But one can never cheat nature within.
Living in social(knowledge)(lateral) world is not,has not to be and will not be simple way. Living in social world needs technique as world is full of lawful(one of two by three for four) plural(10) complexities. That technique is appearing(feeling) as inconsistent TO inconsisitent/s while being adverse-minded to appearing(feeling) consistent/s. Then only you can make yourself and other/s as true consistent/s(moral). That means one should not eliminate inconsistent(EVIL). But one should make inconsistency((EVIL FORCE within EVIL PERSON) self-eliminate by itself. In other words EVIL IN EVIL MIND WILL BE MADE TO SELF-ELIMINATE BY ITSELF THROUGH INCLUDING EVIL MIND. Definition of EVIL MIND IS RECTION(question like why what how where). Being(appearing reaction to reaction(EVIL) will be making reaction self-eliminate by itself. For that,discipline of mind through opting subjects of interest and practising those subjects of interest by doing what is being said when asked while saying what is being done when asked. If there is no discipline of mind through mind stability and routine life,then one can't reach and stay as self in self and other/s in his/her life destination for peace,enlightenment,equality and love(making self as self in self) and glory(in power or truth which is at the ultimate). THAT IS RAMRAJYA which means full emancipation of human society into equality(with self within self and other/s).
