SAYING NEGATIVE TO OTHER/S NEGATIVE IS POSITIVE TO PREVAIL NEGATIVE FOR SOLVING OTHER/S NEGATIVITY.

AS IS PLURALITY OF MEN,SO IS PLURALITY OF FOODS.

IT'S DEMON-MINDED KONIDELA NAGABABU Vs DEVIL-MINDED NANDAMURI BALAKRISHNA NOW. 

WHY-WHAT IS BASIC QUESTION FOR EVOLUTION OF HUMANISM OVER FEUDALISM.

YES ! ROWDIES WERE INTRODUCED INTO POLITICS BY LATE.NTR.        ANYHOW POLITICAL CROOK 'NADENDLA BHASKAR RAO' WHO IS REPENTING NOW ABOUT 'STARTING REGIONAL PARTY IN ANDHRAPRADESH STATE WHICH GAVE RISE TO POWER AMONG MANY REGIONAL PARTIES ALL OVER INDIA'.        MAINSTREAM POLITICS NEVER ACCEPT ON BEING REGIONALISM TO PREVAIL AS NATIONALISM.        INDIAN NATIONALISM CHARACTERISTIC IS PREVAILANCE OF INDIAN REGIONALISM.  

YES ! SUPREME COURT OF INDIA IS PREVAILING RIGHT IN GOOD OVER PUBLIC ADMINSTRATIVE MATTERS.       THAT IS WHAT WE AT INC HAVE BEEN ADVOCATING ABOUT INDIAN JUDICIARY SHOULD LIMIT ITSELF TO INTER-DEPARTMENTAL DISPUTES AND INTER-SOCIAL GROUPS DISPUTES 'BY AVOIDING INTO PERSONAL DISPUTES OF INDIANS'.      --------------------------------------------------      YES ! BJP,RSS ,VHP AND INDIAN POLICE DEPT DON'T BELIEVE(OR PREVAIL) IN 'EQUALITY FOR ALL' WHICH IS THE CONSTITUTIONAL OBLIGATION.      YES ! BJP,ITS ALLIES AND INDIAN POLICE BELIEVE IN 'INEQUALITY(SECTARIANISM) FOR ALL' AS THEY JUST RESPECT(SAY) 'EQUALITY FOR ALL'.       AND SAYING EQUALITY FOR ALL WILL NEVER PREVAIL AS BEING EQUALITY FOR ALL.        SATYAMEVA JAYATHE MEANS PREVAILANCE OF BEING EQUALITY FOR ALL.        SRAMAYEVA JAYATHE MEANS PREVAILANCE OF SAYING EQUALITY FOR ALL.          

ONLY BODY-POLITIC OF INDIA AND INDIANS NEED BE JUDGED FROM ALL WORLD NATIONS POINT OF VIEW.       WE IN INDIA LACK BETTER KNOWLEDGE POLITICIANS WHO CAN 'SIMULTANEOUSLY GUIDE(RULE)' BOTH BODY-POLITIC OF INDIA AND INDIANS AND WORLD BODY-POLITIC.        IT MAY BE BECAUSE WORLD AND ITS LEADER INDIA WERE BEING STILL DIVIDED TO PREVAIL UNITED AT ULTIMATE.        

TRANSGENDER IS BECAUSE OF DIABOLISM (EXTREME -EXTREME) WHICH IS SOCIAL MIND WEAKNESS.       

EX.MP SABBAM HARI IS IGNORANT ABOUT POLITICAL LOGIC THAT ONE PARTY WEAKNESSES CAN NEVER BE OTHER PARTY STRENGTHS.        MORE OVER THAT, BECAUSE OF NARA CHANDRABABU NAIDU 'BEING 100% RIGHT AND EFFICIENT' ,TDP CAN NEVER BE ABLE TO PREVAIL AS 100% RIGHT AND EFFICIENT TO RULE NEXT TERM.       ANY COMMON MAN WILL AGREE THAT 'BEING 100% EFFICIENCY CAN NEVER PREVAIL AS 100% EFFICIENCY'.       THAT IS WHY MY INDIAN NATIONAL CONGRESS WAS APPEARING 100% EFFICIENCY TO MAKE SELF AND ALL OTHER/S PREVAIL 100% EFFICIENCY ALL ALONG ITS JOURNEY SINCE ITS FOUNDATION DAY ON DEC 28th 1885 AD.   

INDIAN POLICE SYSTEM WAS EVOLVED RIGHT AND GOOD ONLY IN 1857 AD.         BEFORE THAT,INDIAN POLICE SYSTEM NEED WAS DISMAL.         SO MY POINT IS THAT 'INDIAN POLICE SYSTEM' WAS BEING UNABLE TO RISE ABOVE SOCIETY EVILS(CRIME AND ILL)(CONSPIRACY) FOR REASONS BEST KNOWN TO ITSELF'.         THAT WAS BEING WHY "CHOWKIDAAR CHOR HAI" WORD CAME INTO PUBLIC USE NOW AS INDIAN POLICE WERE BEING UNABLE TO REALISE HOW CAN INDIAN POLICE BE PREVAILING AS CHOR ? 

AS RESERVATION BILL FOR ECONOMICALLY BACKWARD UPPER CASTES IS 'CONSIDERED AS' AN IMPORTANT BILL NOW,MEMBERS OF BOTH HOUSES NEED BE GIVEN ENOUGH TIME TO DRAFT THEIR ARGUMENTS TO BE DEBATED BY THE HOUSE WHEN BILL CAME UP FOR DEBATE.   

INDIAN PROBLEM OF 'SOCIO-POLITICAL COMPLEXITY' IS PECULIAR TO INDIA ITSELF THAN TO WORLD.              SOCIO-POLITICAL COMPLEXITY IS COMPLEXITY BETWEEN WORK(LAW) AND VOICE(KNOWLEDGE).              ONLY PEOPLE WHO STUDIES OUTSIDE INDIA THEN IN PRE-INDEPENDENCE DAYS WERE ABLE TO UNDERSTAND SOCIO-POLITICAL COMPLEXITY.              ------------------------------------------              MY POINT IS THAT EVEN SARDAR PATEL,NETAJI SUBHASCHANDRA BOSE AND B R AMBEDKAR 'JUST APPEARED TO UNDERSTAND BUT UNABLE TO UNDERSTAND SOCIO-POLITICAL COMPLEXITY'.              WHEREAS KULAPATI K.M.MUNSHI UNDERSTOOD SOCIO-POLITICAL COMPLEXITY.               

AVOID CONFUSING AUDIENCES.          COMPLAINANT HERE IS 'REST OF THOSE-FOUR(AA NALUGURU)'.           DEFENDANT HERE IS 'THOSE-FOUR(AA NALUGURU)'.           JUDGE IS BOTH SIDES WORDS AGAINST THEIR OTHER/S.            DEFENDANT HAS TO PROVE THAT HE(THOSE FOUR) IS RIGHT IN GOOD.            -------------------------------             USE OF WORDS LIKE BIG PRODUCERS/BIG HEROES  AND SMALL PRODUCERS/SMALL HEROES IS 'PUBLIC NUISANCE AND IMMATURE' BECAUSE INDIAN CINEMA SYSTEM IS PREVAILING 'NOW' AS THE-WORST-OF-THE-WORST FOR THE REASON THAT 'CINEMA IS NOT SERVING COMPLEXITY BETWEEN WORLD PEOPLE BETTER SOCIO-ECONOMICS AND INDUSTRY FISCAL YEAR PERFORMANCE'.