SAYING NEGATIVE TO OTHER/S NEGATIVE IS POSITIVE TO PREVAIL NEGATIVE FOR SOLVING OTHER/S NEGATIVITY.

We need solve law ambiguity which was necessary in immature society(intellect) then into law maturity which was necessary now.

     INC did it over past 10 years.     Watch this video towards self-realisation of indian's DREAM of change over past 10 years between then and now.     Above point follows storyline of telugu film '1 nenokkadine'.Isn't it so?

నేను అసాంఘిక నిరాశా వాది గా కనిపిస్తాను .  నేను అసాంఘిక సాంఘికుడిగా ఉంటాను .  నేను సాంఘిక నిరాశా వాదిగా భావన చేస్తాను . 

   Morality has two parts and four feelings.Those four feelings are heroic(legislature),villainy(media),comedian(police) and character artistes(executive).    In stead of campaign for morality to be done by aam aadmi party,arvind kesrival is in hurry to solve crime-corruption.    Is it not silly and hurry which hampers law and economy?

    Those who are in power(truth) must practise LAW OF CONCURRENCY,LAW OF INTERCHANGEABILITY AND LAW OF APPROXIMATIONS.

    One can't be positive by being negative at other or self.      Both vallabhaneni vamsi and IPS officer sitaramanjaneyulu need learn.

         మీరు గమనించాల్సిన విషయము ఏమంటే నేడు జరిగిన పై వార్తను ఆంధ్ర ప్రదేశ్ రాష్ట్రములో ఒక్క సాక్షి వార్తా పత్రిక/లేదా టీవీ ఛానల్ వెలుగు లోకి తెచ్చింది .      నీతి ఏమంటే కేవలము మాట నిలకడ లేని పిచ్చి వారు మాత్రమే తోటి వారిని పిచ్చి వారిగా భావవ్యక్తీకరణ చేస్తారు . మానసిక వైద్య శాస్త్రము చెప్పేది అదే . -------------------------- ONLY INCONSISTENT(LINEAR THINKING) PERSONS SAY OTHER/S AS INCONSISTENT.         

     Discussion/argument in legislative assemblies/parliament is 'just within party policy decisions framework'.      Indian democracy is party democracy but not personal freedom.     Discussion/argument as OPPOSING INDIVIDUAL either within social group or in legislative assemblies/parliament is criminal. --------------------------------------------------     1.DISCUSSION ON SUBJECT FOR MORAL QUALITY AS OPPOSING INDIVIDUAL IS LEGAL ONLY IN CLASSROOM OF 40.     2.ARGUMENT ON SUBJECT FOR MORAL FEELING AS OPPOSING INDIVIDUAL IS LEGAL ONLY IN COURT-HALL. --------------------------------------------------     Personal discussion on issue of public nature in professional media is illegal.    Personal argument on issue of public nature in legislature houses or parliament houses is illegal. -------------------------------------------------     Discussion and argument have place-sensitiveness and situation-sensitiveness among people. ----------------------------------------

    Supposing that undavalli arun kumar words are true,he conveniently ignored to explain why-what present politician(MPs & MLAs in all states) are SELFISH?     As people are selfish in their voice,so selfish are politicians.    SELFISHNESS IN INDIAN POLITICS CAUSED ANDHRA-PRADESH STATE BIFURCATION.    Simple logic.   --------------------------------------------     TELANGANA STATE IS BEING FORMED JUST AGAINST BACKDROP OF SELFISH MPs & MLAs FROM ALL INDIAN STATES.     TELANGANA STATEHOOD IS NOT STATE GOVT ISSUE BUT CENTRAL GOVT ISSUE.     GOVT OF INDIA IS MORE RESPONSIBLE THAN SEEMA-ANDHRA POLITICIANS(MPs & MLAs). ---------------------------------------------     Any local issue need be discussed/argued at state govt level.     Any state issue need be discussed/argued at central govt level.     Any national issue need be discussed/argued at international level. ---------------------------------------------     Undavalli arun kumar! Political issues like telan

    Shortcuts like above for moral-mind will end up costly as non-governance towards better world socio-economics. ---------------------------------------------    SYSTEM CHANGES FROM DECEPTION TO TRUTH IN PAST CONTINUOUS RULE EVERYDAY AT SLOW AND SILENT PACE WHICH COMMON MAN AND MEDIOCRE MEN CAN'T RECOGNISE THAT MINUTE CHANGE.    AT THE END,SYSTEM CHANGES IN SUDDEN AND SWIFT WAY.   SO PLEASE NOTE THAT WISE-KNOWLEDGEABLE RULING CONGRESSMEN SHALL NOT AND DO NOT CHANGE WHILE SYSTEM IS CHANGING.  -----------------------------------------------    WE AT INC DON'T CHANGE WHEN PEOPLE ARE CHANGING BY INTELLECT-LAW AS  WE AT INC ARE TRUE REVOLUTIONARY-MINDED BY OBJECTIVE-THOUGHT.    POLITICS IS OUTSMARTING OTHER/S EVEN THOUGH PAINFUL.