SAYING NEGATIVE TO OTHER/S NEGATIVE IS POSITIVE TO PREVAIL NEGATIVE FOR SOLVING OTHER/S NEGATIVITY.

Posts

Showing posts from October 31, 2016

Truth is highly subjective which means "point of anything to point of anything". So naturally law courts fail to understand truth(power). Social mind is follower of his followers.Whereas personal mind is follower of his teller's. So social mind has right to kill criminals.Whereas personal mind has no right to kill criminals. That means govt can kill criminals whereas law courts are not supposed to kill criminals. This is very important.

- October 31, 2016

సత్య శోధన : ఇద్దరు వ్యక్తులు ఒకే సత్యము (అధికారత ) కొరకు వెదకటము ప్రారంభించి ఇద్దరూ రెండు వేరు వేరు గమ్యములు చేరుకోవడము అనేది "ఏకైక సత్యము ". ఆత్మను మోసము చేసుకోవద్దు .

So public criticism should not have counter-criticism. COUNTER-CRITICISM BY ANY PUBLIC INFLUENTIAL/S OR PUBLIC POWERFUL/S IS CRIMINAL. This is my STRICT ORDER to them.

- October 31, 2016

పబ్లిక్ ప్రశ్నను పబ్లిక్ వ్యక్తి కి పరిష్కరించే "శక్తి యుక్తి" ఉంటుంది కనుక పబ్లిక్ ప్రశ్నను మరియు ఆ పబ్లిక్ ప్రశ్న వేసే వ్యక్తిని ఎంజాయ్ చేస్తాడు . శక్తి అనేది సినిమా (వీడియో ) రూపములో కలిగే భావన . యుక్తి అనేది మానసిక "క్రమ "శిక్షణ ద్వారా కలిగే పరిష్కరింపబడే గణిత సమస్య. --------

Those public questioners will face their adversity in other public questioners only. And anarchists who believe in wrong-doing will face their adversity in other anarchists who are believing in wrong-doing. So ultimately reactionaries and anarchists will join OCEAN called indian national congress which is "public question of public answer/solution". World is uni-polar and uni-govt.

- October 31, 2016

ప్రశ్నించే వారు అయిన నియంతృత్వవాదులు మరియు అరాచకులు "ప్రశ్నించడము యొక్క సమాధానముగా నిలిచేవారిని " ఏమీ చేయలేరు .

O factionists,indian maoists and TDP ! O rowdies,indian police and YSRCP ! THIS IS ONE-TO-ONE WORLD being one world. SO IF YOU CONTINUE TO BE "REALISED.SELF IN SELF" which is half-truth,YOU ARE BOUND TO FACE ADVERSARIES IN ONE FORM OR OTHER which may be law court judges,indian police or political group enemies or health enemies within. MY POINT IS WHEN YOU ARE BEING SELF IN SELF,YOUR INTERVIEWER MUST BE ASKING YOU TO BE SELF IN SOCIAL. It has become fashion for those who are giving interviews to ask media interviewers "to be followers". MEDIA HAS EVERY RIGHT TO BE FREE FROM THOSE WHO ARE GIVING INTERVIEWS. Media can be and has to be.pervert-minded. But media should not be "wishful thinking" or "ego-minded". ONLY ECCENTRIC QUESTIONS BY MEDIA CAN MAKE ITS INTERVIEWEES AS PUBLIC RESPONSIBLE. Public influence or public power is not enjoyment but duty. So media always has to make public influenctials and public powerfuls to be on tenterhooks. Otherwise there is no meaning of democratic freedom of expression. But remember ! Pervert-mind duty is right while wishful thinking duty or ego-minded duty is crime. Maintain fine difference. Media has to right to "examine public people" but should not stoop to "abuse or question public people" because public people are not answerable to media but to public ultimately. EXAMINING IS OUT OF EXAMINING PUBLIC PERSON FREE WILL. ABUSING OR QUESTIONING PUBLIC PERSON IS TRESPASSING INTO PUBLIC PERSON DUTY. Write down questions and double-check questions before asking so that media and public people enjoy their its own freedom(duty) of their subscribers and their public respectively.

- October 31, 2016

నకారాత్మకతగా కనిపించాలి కానీ చూడటము అనేది అసాంఘికత . అయితే సకారాత్మకత గా ఉంటేనే నకారాత్మకత గా కనిపించే అధికారము ఉంటుంది . మనము కనిపించేది ఎదుటి వారి కళ్ళకు మాత్రమే . మనము చూసేది మన కళ్ళకు మాత్రమే . మనము కనిపించేది అనే హ్యూమన్ ఫ్యాకల్టీకి మరియు మనము చూసేది అనే హ్యూమన్ ఫ్యాకల్టీ కి తేడా ఉంది కదా ! ------------

BECAUSE ALL IN ALL IS SOME. When you are being subject,you knows all about subject. But when you are appearing and being ALL AMONG ALL other/s, then you will prevail as SOME(anything of anything) which is realisation that you don't(will never) know anything completely about subject. That is why one has to review about "WHO AM I ?" again and again while being human by becoming human again.

- October 31, 2016

WHEN YOU KNOW SUBJECT COMPLETELY,THEN ONLY YOU WILL REALISE THAT YOU DON'T "ANYTHING OF ANYTHING" ABOUT SUBJECT.