SAYING NEGATIVE TO OTHER/S NEGATIVE IS POSITIVE TO PREVAIL NEGATIVE FOR SOLVING OTHER/S NEGATIVITY.

YEAH ! FIGHTING BACK IS DIFFERENT FROM FIGHTING.         AMITABH BACHCHAN NEED BE CASE STUDY FOR ALL UNIVERSITY MANAGEMENT DEPTS.         APART FROM PHYSICAL ILLNESS SUFFERED DURING 'COOLIE' SHOOTING,AMITABH BACHCHAN SHOWED WORLD HOW TO FIGHT BACK FROM 'BANKRUPTCY' TO 'BILLIONAIRE'.          ------------------------------------------           EVERY MARXIST IN WORLD MUST KNOW HOW WEALTH GENERATION WILL BE PERSONAL-BEING-SOCIAL THAN SOCIAL-BEING-PERSONAL FROM AMITABH BACHCHAN.        YES.MARXISM IS COMPLETELY IRRELEVANT AND OBSOLETE NOW.         PEASANTS AND LABOUR WILL STAY AS PEASANTS AND LABOUR WHILE CAPITALISTS STAY AS CAPITALISTS IN INDIAN(SOCIAL)(KNOWLEDGE) MIXED ECONOMY OF HUMANISM.        AND WORLD TOO SHOULD FOLLOW HUMANISM.

IMAGINATION (ACTING) PROFESSION IS CHEATING IN PUBLIC ABOUT HIS/HER OWN COMPLEXITY AGAINST HIS MIND,HIS HEART AND HIS VOICE AND HIS NAME/FACE.          MY POINT IS IMAGINATION(CINEMA) WORLD AND REAL WORLD ARE TWO RAILS WHICH SHOULD NEVER BE ALLOWED TO MEET.         ANYBODY WHO IS IN IMAGINATION(CINEMA) WORLD SHOULD NOT ENTER REAL WORLD BUT OF COURSE MAY ENTER MEDIA AND SOCIAL NETWORKS.        ANYBODY WHO IS IN POWER POLITICS SHOULD NOT ENTER CINEMA(IMAGINATION) WORLD.         ----------        ------------------        Late.NTR IS RAVANA WHO IS APPEARING-CONSISTENT AGAINST APPEARING-INCONSISTENTS WHILE BEING LAWFUL UNABLE TO PREVAIL LAWFUL.        SO LATE.NTR ONLY DIES TWICE.  

DO MEDIA EVER THINK ABOUT ASKING BETTER QUESTIONS FOR PUBLIC ?        WILL IT BE RIGHT FOR MEDIAPERSONS TO PROVOKE THOUGHTS OF INTERVIEWEES WHEN IT IS WRONG FOR INTERVIEWEES TO PROVOKE THOUGHTS OF MEDIAPERSONS ?        -----------------------------------------        BETTER QUESTIONS MEANS LATERAL SENSE QUESTIONS.         WRITE QUESTIONS IN ADVANCE BEFORE ASKING TO CONVERT THOSE QUESTIONS INTO LATERAL SENSE.              THAT IS VALUABLE JOURNALISM FOR THOSE IN ANY FIELD.         -----------------------------------------         HERE IN ABOVE CONTEXT,MEDIAPERSONS KEEP ON ASKING ALMOST SAME QUESTIONS THAT WERE PREVIOUSLY ASKED AND ANSWERED BY RGV.         HOW CAN A SUBJECT BACKGROUND IN A PARTICULAR REGION OF WORLD BE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OF THAT PARTICULAR REGION PEOPLE ?        HOW CAN A PARTICULAR SUBJECT BACKGROUND BE PROVOCATION OF THAT CONCERNED PEOPLE ?         FILM BUSINESS MEANS DEALING AND MARKETING CONTROVERSIAL(50:50) TOPICS BUSINESS ONLY.          PEOPLE KNOW IT

TDP ! NARA CHANDRA BABU NAIDU ! AP CM ! INCONSISTENCY(OR APPEARING CONSISTENCY) AGAINST ADVERSE QUESTIONS IS NOT AT ALL SUCCESS IN POWER POLITICS.       BUT ONLY INDIAN NATIONAL CONGRESS WHICH IS "APPEARING INCONSISTENCY AGAINST ADVERSE QUESTIONS" IS THE PERENNIAL SUCCESS.       ------------------------       YES.I KNOW YOU ASK ME IN NO TIME.  SO I GIVE EXPLANATION ABOUT MY ABOVE STATEMENT.        APPEARING INCONSISTENCY MEANS PREVAILANCE OF CONSISTENCY 'IF AND ONLY IF GIVEN PROPER ANSWERS' AGAINST ADVERSE QUESTIONS.        APPEARING CONSISTENCY MEANS PREVAILANCE OF INCONSISTENCY 'IF FOUND UNABLE TO GIVE PROPER QUESTIONS' AGAINST ADVERSE QUESTIONS.       SO NARA CHANDRABABU NAIDU AND TDP BUT NOT AP CM ARE 'PREVAILING AS MAD MONKEYS'.