Posts

Showing posts from June 5, 2012

Involve police inspectors in prosecution by chargesheet.

F.I.R.-investigation-chargesheet are Cr.P.C. After F.I.R. & investigation by police,why police inspectors are not involving themselves in chargesheet & prosecution? Without police inspectors involvement in chargesheet & prosecution,public prosecutors can't have strong case for-of-against accused. 

This is for those who see enemies as enemies.

If one is personal voice at first and social heart at next,then he/she  will be social by heart at last and personal by voice at ultimate. This applies to police who see enemies as enemies. Moral is that one should see friends in enemies to see enemies in friends. 

Expand psyche.

Doctors see concurrent balance at 15:85 by biochemical reactions. Engineers see system inter-change at 66:33 by numerical methods. Police see legal precision at 10:90 by english grammar. Above three are basic essentials in human society.

Women have home duty of making men to deserve true in social.

Those who are objective(appear)(negative and positive) right are expected to be true right in social. And prakruthi(women) exist objectively right. Then only purusha(men) will be made subjectively right at next to avoid rape & gamble.

Let's voice truth.

Social ambiguity(contrasts) & imagination(ACADEMIC) are ending soon. Stories will end soon. Only real truthful social will stay. Quality is personal. Self(spiritual) is social.

ONLY hindu law leads to human salvation.

Cross of curve is straight. Hindu law is STRAIGHT-FORWARD purusha("negative" OR "positive") @ prakruthi("negative AND positive"). Hindu law is like engineering by both voice(words) & heart(hand). So world nations need study mahabharat contrasts for court respect at first. World nations need discuss ramayan explanations by scholars in english for qualities at next. World nations need realise bhagavatham for SELF(sense)(heart) at last.

Public adminstration is arguing contrasts and discussing brightness.

Solution to immoral legal world starts at arguing contrasts for character build in courts and ends at discussing brightness for qualities in classes.