SAYING NEGATIVE TO OTHER/S NEGATIVE IS POSITIVE TO PREVAIL NEGATIVE FOR SOLVING OTHER/S NEGATIVITY.

INDIAN UNIVERSITIES SOCIAL RESEARCH ON GLOBAL BUSINESSES CAN OFFER BETTER KNOWLEDGE.

PROVOCATION OF MIND/S OF PROTESTORS BY ANY GOVT(ESTABLISHMENT) IS NATURAL.     BUT PROTESTORS SHOULD STAY AS PEACEFUL AND NON-VIOLENT "SO THAT GOVT(ESTABLISHMENT)(EMBASSY) PREVAIL AS PEACEFUL AND NON-VIOLENT".     OF COURSE ! PROVOCATORS OF MIND/S ON BOTH SIDES SHOULD NOT BE PROVOCATORS OF HEART/S. BY ORDER, RAMA.

A RUPEE OR DOLLAR SPENT BY CONSUMER ON EITHER GENERIC DRUG OR BRAND-NAME DRUG IS SAME.      BUT ONLY AMOUNT OF DRUG PRICE MAY BE VARYING.      SO GOVTS NEED INTERVENE FOR UPHOLDING PUBLIC HEALTH AMONG ALL. BY ORDER, RAMA.

ARGUMENT IS DEFINED AS CONTESTING OTHER/S WORD/S WITH SELF WORD/S 'BEFORE COURT OF LAW'.       HOW CAN PETITIONER/S BE SILENT BEFORE COURT OF LAW?       PETITIONER LAWYER SHOULD NOT JEOPARDISE COURT SYSTEMS AND PROCEDURES. BY ORDER, RAMA.     

ALL PRESENT GOVTS THROUGHOUT WORLD ARE 'ANTISOCIAL KNOWLEDGE' GOVTS.       SO MEDIA SHOULD SPEAK AND WRITE 'AT THE OUTSET' ON ANY PRESENT GOVT IN WORLD.      IT HELPS OPTIMISTICALLY BOTH WORLD PEOPLE AND THEIR GOVTS PREVAIL AS 'SOCIAL KNOWLEDGE' SOON.       MEDIA NEED AVOID UNNECESSARY MIND APPLICATION ON ITSELF. BY ORDER, RAMA.       

YES ! UNIVERSAL LAW IS ONE AND THE SAME FOR ALL.     UNIVERSAL LAW IS THAT ANYTHING WHICH WILL BE REACHING ITS MAXIMUM MEANS ANYTHING WHICH WILL BE REACHING ITS MINIMUM 'SIMULTANEOUSLY'.     IN OTHER WORDS,STABILITY IS NATURAL AS LONG AS IT IS DYNAMIC.    AND WORLD IS EVER-DYNAMIC.    -----------------------------------------------    ABOVE UNIVERSAL LAW NATURALLY LEADS TO 'RIGHT IN GOOD' OPTIMISM PREVAILANCE ANYWHERE.     FOR EXAMPLE,CRIME & ILL RATE BECOMING STABLE AT FIRST PREVAILS AS ZERO AT NEXT IN DYNAMIC WORLD.     THAT MEANS PREVAILANCE OF 'JUST WORLD' IS SOON. BY ORDER, RAMA.     

HISTORY WRITTEN OR TOLD HAD NEVER BEEN 'SOCIAL BEING PERSONAL TO PERSONAL'.       HUMAN HISTORY HAD ALWAYS BEEN 'PERSONAL BEING SOCIAL TO SOCIAL'. --------------------------------------------------------------------       IF ABOVE POINT IS KEPT IN MIND WHILE 'DISCUSSING' ABOUT IT,THEN 'DEBATES OF HISTORIANS AND HISTORY BOOKS ON SOCIAL MEDIA' will be MORE MEANINGFUL AND TRUTHFUL ATLEAST FROM NOW IN THIS KNOWLEDGE(SOCIAL)(LATERAL) AGE.     ----------------------------------------------------------------     REGARDING ABOVE POINT THAT 'EAST INDIA COMPANY BECOMING POWERFUL BECAUSE THEN BRITISH PARLIAMENT COLLUDED WITH IT', HERE HISTORIAN WILLIAM DALRYMPLE CONVENIENTLY IGNORED TO MENTION THE OTHER SIDE OF STORY.     THE OTHER SIDE OF STORY IS THAT HERE IN INDIA THEN,INDIAN IMPERIALISTS LIKE INDIAN MAHARAJAHS AND SO ON WERE ALSO COLLUDERS WITH INDIAN PEOPLE THEN.      SO 'COLLUDING AGAINST COLLUDERS WHILE BEING ADVERSE WITH BEING ADV