AP High court interesting comments on capital relocation || nidhi tv

-
ARGUMENT IS DEFINED AS CONTESTING OTHER/S WORD/S WITH SELF WORD/S 'BEFORE COURT OF LAW'.

      HOW CAN PETITIONER/S BE SILENT BEFORE COURT OF LAW?

      PETITIONER LAWYER SHOULD NOT JEOPARDISE COURT SYSTEMS AND PROCEDURES.



BY ORDER,

RAMA.



    

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Media is antisocial by nature of existence.So any accused need not have duty to answer media questions. Vijay Mallya ! If media exceeds its limit,then media should be in jail. This is my order.

-
Image
Yes! Vijay Mallya is declared "wilful defaulter" by ED and Banks. Does it mean that vijay mallya has duty to give answer to Arnab goswami questions ? Why don't media think that Vijay Mallya fled India because of heat caused by media ? Does Vijay Mallya have duty towards govt ED,Indian law courts and banks or towards Arnab goswami ?
Read more