A person after being net worth of Rs.10000 is starting discussion on subject FOR another Rs.10000 at present end times towards "his/her word-prevailance". Then how can a leader(MLA/MP/Film hero)(public representative) wish to loose his/her word-prevailance "among public by scrutiny" ? It is wishful thinking among immoral 5 social vulnerable sections that a crorepathi after attaining 16 steps of snakes and ladders game wants to loose his word-prevailance "among public by either law court scrutiny or govt confiscation".






Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When there is no knowledge(which seeks self or sensible mindful voice)(literary words) to any mathematical or biochemical law,then it will be either self ignorance or social ignorance. So information thus obtained in other/s must be complexed(adverse) with self(sensible mindful voice) by applying one's mind on his/her mind again towards goal of equality(peace),love(retaining self as self in other/s) and truth(which solves deception appearance as deception can not stand against adverse questions). Law in universe is one. That law is being lawful only to lawful as society matures. And purpose of that universal law is to solve immorality(inconsistency against adverse questions)(being self in self and other/s) into morality(being other/s in self or being self in self). That means any voter can question universal law. But no voter can rise above universal law. Pl.note that any public questioner goal is to be public solution which means being public question to public question within self. Simple ! Govt audit looks after itself. And people(individuals) will looks after their audit "by being in groups/laws/parties". Govt is party to all diverse parties.