My critics question me about my partiality towards men against their."granted-legality" wives. My partiality towards men than their wives is not meant for belittling role of wives/mothers in society "FOR FUTURE (which is past of past to past). My partiality towards men than their wives is meant "ABOUT PAST(whcih is future of future to future)".

If anyone can't answer social(why-what-how-where) questions by adversaries,he/she is LAZY.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When there is no knowledge(which seeks self or sensible mindful voice)(literary words) to any mathematical or biochemical law,then it will be either self ignorance or social ignorance. So information thus obtained in other/s must be complexed(adverse) with self(sensible mindful voice) by applying one's mind on his/her mind again towards goal of equality(peace),love(retaining self as self in other/s) and truth(which solves deception appearance as deception can not stand against adverse questions). Law in universe is one. That law is being lawful only to lawful as society matures. And purpose of that universal law is to solve immorality(inconsistency against adverse questions)(being self in self and other/s) into morality(being other/s in self or being self in self). That means any voter can question universal law. But no voter can rise above universal law. Pl.note that any public questioner goal is to be public solution which means being public question to public question within self. Simple ! Govt audit looks after itself. And people(individuals) will looks after their audit "by being in groups/laws/parties". Govt is party to all diverse parties.