My critics question me about my partiality towards men against their."granted-legality" wives. My partiality towards men than their wives is not meant for belittling role of wives/mothers in society "FOR FUTURE (which is past of past to past). My partiality towards men than their wives is meant "ABOUT PAST(whcih is future of future to future)".

If anyone can't answer social(why-what-how-where) questions by adversaries,he/she is LAZY.