Pawan Kalyan Uncontrollable Angry Reaction For Reporter's Question | #P...
PAVAN KALYAN AND HIS JANASENA DON'T UNDERSTAND THAT BEING REVOLUTIONARY NEVER PREVAILS SO.
AND PAVAN KALYAN WAS BEING UNABLE TO DISTINGUISH BETWEEN 'BEING INDIAN MEDIA WHICH IS ANTISOCIAL(TAMAS) FOR(AGAINST) INDIAN PUBLIC ' AND 'BEING INDIAN PUBLIC WHO PREVAIL AS SOCIAL(TAMAS TO TAMAS)' BOTH IN HIS APPEARING(FEELING) AND HIS BEING.
My point is simple.
PAVAN KALYAN CAN ALWAYS BE PERENNIAL KINGMAKER BUT CAN NEVER PREVAIL AS KING.
YES ! JANASENA CAN PREVAIL JUST 'A CATALYST' BUT CAN NEVER PREVAIL AS 'TRUE POWER' IN INDIAN POLITY TOWARDS SOCIAL CHANGE.
AND PAVAN KALYAN WAS BEING UNABLE TO DISTINGUISH BETWEEN 'BEING INDIAN MEDIA WHICH IS ANTISOCIAL(TAMAS) FOR(AGAINST) INDIAN PUBLIC ' AND 'BEING INDIAN PUBLIC WHO PREVAIL AS SOCIAL(TAMAS TO TAMAS)' BOTH IN HIS APPEARING(FEELING) AND HIS BEING.
My point is simple.
PAVAN KALYAN CAN ALWAYS BE PERENNIAL KINGMAKER BUT CAN NEVER PREVAIL AS KING.
YES ! JANASENA CAN PREVAIL JUST 'A CATALYST' BUT CAN NEVER PREVAIL AS 'TRUE POWER' IN INDIAN POLITY TOWARDS SOCIAL CHANGE.
Comments