కోడలిపై రిటైర్డ్ హైకోర్టు జడ్జి దాడి... Face To Face With Sindhu Sharma ...
ATLEAST FROM NOW ONWARDS,SOCIETY SHOULD AVOID TO BELIEVE IN JUDICIARY PREVAILANCE OVER 'SENSE(WORD) OF MINDFUL VOICE'.
INDIAN JUDICIARY IS CASTEISM PREVAILANCE WHICH IS INABILITY TO SEE SELF FROM OTHER/S. THAT WAS WHY TWO NATION THEORY OF SECULAR INDIA AND ISLAMIC PAKISTAN WAS BROUGHT FORWARD BY IMPERIAL BRITISH THEN.
PAKISTANIS WERE INDIANS TO INDIANS WHILE INDIANS WERE PAKISTANIS TO PAKISTANIS. THAT WAS WHY 'PAKISTAN BEING ANTISOCIAL(TAMAS) WHICH IS NOT SUPPOSED TO PREVAIL SO' WAS BEING PITTED AGAINST 'INDIA WHICH IS APPEARING SOCIAL(TAMAS TO TAMAS) AGAINST "BEING EITHER SOCIAL(TAMAS TO TAMAS) OR ANTISOCIAL(TAMAS)" ' WHICH IS SUPPOSED TO PREVAIL AS SOCIAL(TAMAS TO TAMAS).
YES ! 'CASTEISM PREVAILANCE OVER SENSE ' AND 'PAKISTAN' WERE BEING BRILLIANTLY PITTED AGAINST EACH OTHER BY 'IMPERIAL-MINDED' BRITISH.
MY SINCERE THANKS TO IMPERIALISTS (DEMOCRATS TO DEMOCRATS) !
BY ORDER,
RAMA
INDIAN JUDICIARY IS CASTEISM PREVAILANCE WHICH IS INABILITY TO SEE SELF FROM OTHER/S. THAT WAS WHY TWO NATION THEORY OF SECULAR INDIA AND ISLAMIC PAKISTAN WAS BROUGHT FORWARD BY IMPERIAL BRITISH THEN.
PAKISTANIS WERE INDIANS TO INDIANS WHILE INDIANS WERE PAKISTANIS TO PAKISTANIS. THAT WAS WHY 'PAKISTAN BEING ANTISOCIAL(TAMAS) WHICH IS NOT SUPPOSED TO PREVAIL SO' WAS BEING PITTED AGAINST 'INDIA WHICH IS APPEARING SOCIAL(TAMAS TO TAMAS) AGAINST "BEING EITHER SOCIAL(TAMAS TO TAMAS) OR ANTISOCIAL(TAMAS)" ' WHICH IS SUPPOSED TO PREVAIL AS SOCIAL(TAMAS TO TAMAS).
YES ! 'CASTEISM PREVAILANCE OVER SENSE ' AND 'PAKISTAN' WERE BEING BRILLIANTLY PITTED AGAINST EACH OTHER BY 'IMPERIAL-MINDED' BRITISH.
MY SINCERE THANKS TO IMPERIALISTS (DEMOCRATS TO DEMOCRATS) !
BY ORDER,
RAMA
Comments