So any royal naturally intends to make his subjects/people as rich(consistent against adverse questions) by exploiting and oppressing poverty(inconsistency against adverse questions) among poor at first and liberating poverty(inconsistency against adverse questions) at next. No royal is supposed to liberate his immoral subjects(people) without exploiting and oppressing at first. Because any royal is human enough to think that other/s are also human to appear same to same while being different. One should make other/s as other/s in their self for self to self. No royal thinks that his subjects(people) are machines and beasts whic don't have mind discretion which means fox mind, That means a consistent has to be consistent with other/s among other consistents. Otherwise consistency suffers.




Comments