But my point to Sri Ramakrishna paramahamsa is that he should not have swami vivekananada as his disciple as swami vivekananda is not saying what he is doing when asked and not doing what he is saying when asked. That is why Hindu-Muslim amity didn't happen "even in 20th century AD". Hindu-Muslim amity happened only in 21st century AD which is knowledge age". So my point is that Ramakrishna paramhamsa didn't contribute laterally as m k Gandhi did to society


అవును ! ఇద్దరు పిల్లలు కలిగిన తరువాత భార్యా భర్తలు అనబడే వారు సోదర సోదరీమణులుగా ఉండాలి . 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When there is no knowledge(which seeks self or sensible mindful voice)(literary words) to any mathematical or biochemical law,then it will be either self ignorance or social ignorance. So information thus obtained in other/s must be complexed(adverse) with self(sensible mindful voice) by applying one's mind on his/her mind again towards goal of equality(peace),love(retaining self as self in other/s) and truth(which solves deception appearance as deception can not stand against adverse questions). Law in universe is one. That law is being lawful only to lawful as society matures. And purpose of that universal law is to solve immorality(inconsistency against adverse questions)(being self in self and other/s) into morality(being other/s in self or being self in self). That means any voter can question universal law. But no voter can rise above universal law. Pl.note that any public questioner goal is to be public solution which means being public question to public question within self. Simple ! Govt audit looks after itself. And people(individuals) will looks after their audit "by being in groups/laws/parties". Govt is party to all diverse parties.