Personalisation(customisation) is destined to solve anarchy(antisocial)(tamas). Socialisation is destined to nurture knowledge(control between upper limit and lower limit). Both are needed CONCURRENTLY to be complete personality. Practical(singing) brilliance is that when I am uttering my words(sense) with other/s,other/s are making me more and more brilliant with their response(transient and frequency) EVEN AFTER MY SENSE IS REACHED BY OTHER/S. So in this way,my other/s are making me see depth and shades of PLURAL.(10) society. That means my other/s are making me as "middle self in their middle". HENCE MY THESIS IS ONE HAS TO PRACTISE PRACTICALITY. Once we start practising practicality(being what is saying when asked while saying what is being when asked). If we are appearing infidel(ambiguous)(conspiring-mindset),that means we are being stable-mind. Either purity or darkness or energy are abstract.qualities which can't lead us to nowhere by retaining us in ambiguity(failure) which is either rationalism or religious "but not complex rationalist being religious". Avoid either just subjective-mindset as leftists do or just objective-sense as Buorgeous do" Be middle path to middle path. We humans are good receptors but bad transmitters as social transmission is complex,subjective and sensibility. Isn't it ? My critics of my words are my destiny makers. I can take out illness from criticism of my words "like swan which separates water from milk". I AM LIKE complex SWAN AND WATER. And my other/s are MILK.

"అతి ఘనము యొక్క అతి ఘనము కు అతి ఘనము " యొక్క "అతి హీనము యొక్క అతి హీనము కు అతి హీనము "  నుండి "మిత ఘనము యొక్క మిత ఘనము కు మిత ఘనము " యొక్క "మిత హీనము యొక్క మిత హీనము కు మిత హీనము " గమనము జరగాలి -జరుగుతుంది -ఎందుకు జరుగదు ?