Social-mind "which is personal-mind TO personal-mind" JUST APPEARS to follow a pattern of its own sense. Social-mind which is "being personal-mind TO personal-mind" exists to solve personal-mind. So there can't be existence of personal-mind TO solve social-mind. Because prevailance is social-mind but not personal-mind. AND WE AS HUMAN BEINGS SHOULD CRAVE FOR THINGS THAT HAVE PREVAILANCE. HOW CAN WE HUMAN BEINGS CRAVE FOR THINGS THAT HAVE EXISTENCE WITHOUT PREVAILANCE ? Can immorals(inconsistents against adverse questions)(personal-MIND) prevail over morals(consistents against adverse questions)(social-mind) ? I HEREBY REITERATE THAT PRESENT STRUGGLE IN WORLD SOCIETY IS BETWEEN IMMORALS(who use public imagiantion)(inconsistents against adverse questions)(personal-mind)(RAVANA-ASURA OR RAVANA-BRAHMA) AND MORALS(who are "public imagiantion TO public imagination" by using those who use public imagination)(consistents against adverse questions) FOR TRUTH(power) AT THE ULTIMATE. That means selfish worship of god(fear) by having god(fear) without overcoming god(fear) is,has to be and will be destined NATURALLY towards "prayer/s by devotees who don't apply mind FOR prasadam (resultant fruit) to devotees who apply mind on mind). I reiterate that bhagavadgita clearly says against "saying without being". Truth is moral(consistent against adverse questions) power which is BEING SELF BY SAYING OTHER SO.

Personal-MIND follows a pattern of its own sense.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When there is no knowledge(which seeks self or sensible mindful voice)(literary words) to any mathematical or biochemical law,then it will be either self ignorance or social ignorance. So information thus obtained in other/s must be complexed(adverse) with self(sensible mindful voice) by applying one's mind on his/her mind again towards goal of equality(peace),love(retaining self as self in other/s) and truth(which solves deception appearance as deception can not stand against adverse questions). Law in universe is one. That law is being lawful only to lawful as society matures. And purpose of that universal law is to solve immorality(inconsistency against adverse questions)(being self in self and other/s) into morality(being other/s in self or being self in self). That means any voter can question universal law. But no voter can rise above universal law. Pl.note that any public questioner goal is to be public solution which means being public question to public question within self. Simple ! Govt audit looks after itself. And people(individuals) will looks after their audit "by being in groups/laws/parties". Govt is party to all diverse parties.