If you believe in your word,you must be able to believe other's word for your word. Until then,you have right to argue with other/s. That doesn't mean you have unending right to argue with other/s. Litigancy is that you have to right to argue until sense(heart) is arrived between both. LAW BASIC TENET IN HUMAN HISTORY IS NOT LAW BUT SENSE. There is difference between law and sense even though both appear as same. Law and sense are same in magnitude but differ in direction. That is why your vote should never be law but becomes sense among self and other/s. No sane person takes law(govt) as his profession. Students learning about law are learning law only to practise law against antisocial(adversity) which is natural mother of social (oneness). One is not one until and unless it is by two. Personal is not personal until and unless it is by social.

As long as you believe in physical sphere without its psychological sphere or social sphere,you are bound to fail.
As long as you believe in face of people without their voices,you are bound to fail.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When there is no knowledge(which seeks self or sensible mindful voice)(literary words) to any mathematical or biochemical law,then it will be either self ignorance or social ignorance. So information thus obtained in other/s must be complexed(adverse) with self(sensible mindful voice) by applying one's mind on his/her mind again towards goal of equality(peace),love(retaining self as self in other/s) and truth(which solves deception appearance as deception can not stand against adverse questions). Law in universe is one. That law is being lawful only to lawful as society matures. And purpose of that universal law is to solve immorality(inconsistency against adverse questions)(being self in self and other/s) into morality(being other/s in self or being self in self). That means any voter can question universal law. But no voter can rise above universal law. Pl.note that any public questioner goal is to be public solution which means being public question to public question within self. Simple ! Govt audit looks after itself. And people(individuals) will looks after their audit "by being in groups/laws/parties". Govt is party to all diverse parties.