HOW CAN AN ASPIRANT(PREVIOUSLY ELECTED LEADER) BE TREATED EQUAL WITH CONTESTANTS IN PRESENT ELECTION? IS IT NOT DISRESPECT TOWARDS PREVIOUS ELECTION RESULT BY CONTESTANTS AT PRESENT ? PL.STUDY THIS FINE POINT FOR PAST-CONTINUITY.

       I WISH TO TELL AN INTERESTING POINT ON ELECTION.
       IN DEMOCRATIC ELECTION,THERE IS ASPIRANT(SUCCESS)(HERO AND CHARACTER ARTIST) AND CONTESTANT(FAILURE)(COMEDIAN AND VILLAIN).
       SO CONTESTANT PARTIES NEED QUESTION ASPIRANTS BETTER TO AVOID FALSE PROMISES EVERYDAY OVER 48 DAYS.
       MAKING FALSE PROMISES BY ASPIRANT WILL LEAD TO NON-PERFORMANCE AFTER ELECTION.
--------------------------------------------
      And one more important thing! Indian police are in the habit of treating aspirant parties and contestant parties at equal level.
      AN ASPIRANT IS PREVIOUSLY ELECTED LEADER SEEKING RE-ELECTION.
     HOW CAN AN ASPIRANT(who was already previously elected leader) BE EQUAL IN STATURE WITH CONTESTANTS?  
     Of course,an aspirant(whose tenure may have dis-satisfaction for some sections of voters) may not have satisfaction of all voters at present but remember that an aspirant was previously elected leader.
      So an aspirant may be questioned better by contestants for voters but should not be treated equal with contestants by indian police and election commission.  


Comments