Journalists & film directors need change as per mobile & internet technology.

People are boring.
People are always interesting.


But film directors & media journalists are not reaching their subjective truth towards making EITHER positive OR negative.
What can their scripts-actors and editors can do?


What can editors do if journalists are not consistent in their inconsistency?
What can actors & scripts do if directors forget their purpose of making people EITHER positive OR negative?


Both journalists & directors are making NUISANCE OF PURPOSE in their powerful media as IN-BETWEENS(objective-subjectives and subjective-objectives).


Both enjoy socio-legal freedom & respect with no responsibility & purpose.


Freedom means responsibility.
Respect in field means serving social purpose.


When knowledge(positive extreme) thieves are robbing,journalist dogs are just watching.
When in-betweens are ruling society,film directors are just enjoying respect in cine field.


Truth is against lie as simple of complex by complex for complex.
Don't journalists & film directors know above formula?


Both needs to apply in their arguments & discussions that 1)FOR IS FOR OF AGAINST and 2)AGAINST IS AGAINST OF FOR.


High extreme is natural calamity of low earning.
Atleast now journnalists & film directors should SEE HIGH EXTREMES(both subjective-objectives and objective-subjectives) AS MODERATE to make truth as social extreme.
     

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When there is no knowledge(which seeks self or sensible mindful voice)(literary words) to any mathematical or biochemical law,then it will be either self ignorance or social ignorance. So information thus obtained in other/s must be complexed(adverse) with self(sensible mindful voice) by applying one's mind on his/her mind again towards goal of equality(peace),love(retaining self as self in other/s) and truth(which solves deception appearance as deception can not stand against adverse questions). Law in universe is one. That law is being lawful only to lawful as society matures. And purpose of that universal law is to solve immorality(inconsistency against adverse questions)(being self in self and other/s) into morality(being other/s in self or being self in self). That means any voter can question universal law. But no voter can rise above universal law. Pl.note that any public questioner goal is to be public solution which means being public question to public question within self. Simple ! Govt audit looks after itself. And people(individuals) will looks after their audit "by being in groups/laws/parties". Govt is party to all diverse parties.