Buddam sharanam by jayaraju
TRUTH IN REALITY IS BECOMING ONLY.
TRUTH IN REALITY IS NOT BEING SO;HAS NEVER BEEN SO AND WILL NEVER BE SO.
--------------------------------------------------
AND EVERYBODY SEARCHES HIS/HER OWN SUBJECTIVE TRUTH(POWER) WHICH SEEKS SELF TO SURVIVE HIS LIFE AND AFTER.
--------------------------------------------------
SYSTEM CAN HAVE ITS restore point NOT ONLY AMONG TEN(MANY) 'BUT ALSO AMONG TEN(MANY) AGAINST ITS OTHER TEN(MANY)'.
SO LATERAL WORD IS COMPULSORY AGAINST ANY ASTRACT BEING.
--------------------------------------------------
MY POINT HERE IS THAT M K GANDHI PATH IS BUDDHIST PATH WHEREAS B R AMBEDKAR PATH IS HINDU PATH.
VERY VERY VERY VERY VERY VERY VERY IMPORTANT TO BE NOTED BY ALL ! THAT MEANS TO SAY THAT M K GANDHI WAS BEING PREVAILED AS DESTINATION HINDU WHEREAS B R AMBEDKAR WAS BEING PREVAILED AS DESTINATION BUDDHIST.
AND DESTINATION BUDDHISM IS PREVAILING AS SOCIAL-CRIME IN PRESENT RAM-RAJYA (KINGDOM OF LOVE)(KINGDOM OF 'EQUATING WITH ALL OTHER/S').
-----------------------------------------------------
TRUTH IS SIMPLE.
TRUTH IS 'BEING CONSISTENT TO CONSISTENT IN CONSISTENT WHICH MEANS appearing inconsistent MY OWN INDIAN NATIONAL CONGRESS' AGAINST 'BEING INCONSISTENT TO INCONSISTENT IN INCONSISTENT WHICH MEANS being consistent MY POLITICAL ADVERSARY PARTY BJP AND ITS ALLIES'.
APPEARING INCONSISTENT MEANS BEING LATERAL WORD WHICH PREVAILS AS BEING ABSTRACT WORD.
BEING CONSISTENT MEANS BEING ABSTRACT WORD WHICH PREVAILS AS BEING LATERAL WORD.
----------------------------------------------
IF PUBLIC IS STILL UNCLEAR ABOUT SUCCESS OF THEIR INDIAN NATIONAL CONGRESS POLITICAL IDEOLOGY,THEN THEY HAVE TO BE AND WILL BE 'CHANGED' INTO SUCCESS OF THEIR INDIAN NATIONAL CONGRESS POLITICAL IDEOLOGY BY THEIR OTHER/S SOONER OR LATER.
------------------------------------------------
BELIEF IN PLURALISM(MANY-TO-MANY)(LAW)(ACCESS) AT FIRST PREVAILS AS BELIEF IN SOCIAL(KNOWLEDGE)(TRUTH)(EMPOWERMENT) WHICH SEEKS SELF(SENSIBLE MINDFUL VOICE) AT NEXT.
'APPEARING SAME TO SAME BEING DIFFERENT' AT FIRST PREVAILS AS 'APPEARING DIFFERENT BEING SAME TO SAME' AT NEXT.
-----------------------------------------------------
TRUTH IN REALITY IS NOT BEING SO;HAS NEVER BEEN SO AND WILL NEVER BE SO.
--------------------------------------------------
AND EVERYBODY SEARCHES HIS/HER OWN SUBJECTIVE TRUTH(POWER) WHICH SEEKS SELF TO SURVIVE HIS LIFE AND AFTER.
--------------------------------------------------
SYSTEM CAN HAVE ITS restore point NOT ONLY AMONG TEN(MANY) 'BUT ALSO AMONG TEN(MANY) AGAINST ITS OTHER TEN(MANY)'.
SO LATERAL WORD IS COMPULSORY AGAINST ANY ASTRACT BEING.
--------------------------------------------------
MY POINT HERE IS THAT M K GANDHI PATH IS BUDDHIST PATH WHEREAS B R AMBEDKAR PATH IS HINDU PATH.
VERY VERY VERY VERY VERY VERY VERY IMPORTANT TO BE NOTED BY ALL ! THAT MEANS TO SAY THAT M K GANDHI WAS BEING PREVAILED AS DESTINATION HINDU WHEREAS B R AMBEDKAR WAS BEING PREVAILED AS DESTINATION BUDDHIST.
AND DESTINATION BUDDHISM IS PREVAILING AS SOCIAL-CRIME IN PRESENT RAM-RAJYA (KINGDOM OF LOVE)(KINGDOM OF 'EQUATING WITH ALL OTHER/S').
-----------------------------------------------------
TRUTH IS SIMPLE.
TRUTH IS 'BEING CONSISTENT TO CONSISTENT IN CONSISTENT WHICH MEANS appearing inconsistent MY OWN INDIAN NATIONAL CONGRESS' AGAINST 'BEING INCONSISTENT TO INCONSISTENT IN INCONSISTENT WHICH MEANS being consistent MY POLITICAL ADVERSARY PARTY BJP AND ITS ALLIES'.
APPEARING INCONSISTENT MEANS BEING LATERAL WORD WHICH PREVAILS AS BEING ABSTRACT WORD.
BEING CONSISTENT MEANS BEING ABSTRACT WORD WHICH PREVAILS AS BEING LATERAL WORD.
----------------------------------------------
IF PUBLIC IS STILL UNCLEAR ABOUT SUCCESS OF THEIR INDIAN NATIONAL CONGRESS POLITICAL IDEOLOGY,THEN THEY HAVE TO BE AND WILL BE 'CHANGED' INTO SUCCESS OF THEIR INDIAN NATIONAL CONGRESS POLITICAL IDEOLOGY BY THEIR OTHER/S SOONER OR LATER.
------------------------------------------------
BELIEF IN PLURALISM(MANY-TO-MANY)(LAW)(ACCESS) AT FIRST PREVAILS AS BELIEF IN SOCIAL(KNOWLEDGE)(TRUTH)(EMPOWERMENT) WHICH SEEKS SELF(SENSIBLE MINDFUL VOICE) AT NEXT.
'APPEARING SAME TO SAME BEING DIFFERENT' AT FIRST PREVAILS AS 'APPEARING DIFFERENT BEING SAME TO SAME' AT NEXT.
-----------------------------------------------------
Comments