Charges for impeachment are frivolous: Fali S Nariman
FALI S.NARIMAN ! HOW CAN FINAL INTERPRETATION OF CONSTITUTION BE WITH JUDICIARY ?
DO YOU THINK THAT CONSTITUTION WAS ADOPTED BY JUDICIARY BUT NOT BY PARLIAMENT (CONSTITUENT ASSEMBLY THEN) ?
AVOID FRIVOLOUS CHARGES AGAINST PARLIAMENT(SUPREME POWER ON PEOPLE).
MY WORD IS THAT PARLIAMENT IS SUPREME THAN JUDICIARY.
SO PARLIAMENT HAS EVERY POWER TO IMPEACH JUDICIARY.
OF COURSE PRESIDENT OR VICE-PRESIDENT CAN ADVISE PARLIAMENT.
--------------------------------
JUDICIARY IS HAND SIXTH FINGER WHICH WILL BECOME SUPERFLOUS IN MATURE SOCIETY.
PEOPLE'S WILL IS SUPREME OVER JUDICIARY.
THAT IS WHY INDIA IS STILL DOMINION OF BRITISH MONARCHY TO AVOID SUPREMACY OF JUDICIARY OVER PEOPLE'S WILL.
DO YOU THINK THAT CONSTITUTION WAS ADOPTED BY JUDICIARY BUT NOT BY PARLIAMENT (CONSTITUENT ASSEMBLY THEN) ?
AVOID FRIVOLOUS CHARGES AGAINST PARLIAMENT(SUPREME POWER ON PEOPLE).
MY WORD IS THAT PARLIAMENT IS SUPREME THAN JUDICIARY.
SO PARLIAMENT HAS EVERY POWER TO IMPEACH JUDICIARY.
OF COURSE PRESIDENT OR VICE-PRESIDENT CAN ADVISE PARLIAMENT.
--------------------------------
JUDICIARY IS HAND SIXTH FINGER WHICH WILL BECOME SUPERFLOUS IN MATURE SOCIETY.
PEOPLE'S WILL IS SUPREME OVER JUDICIARY.
THAT IS WHY INDIA IS STILL DOMINION OF BRITISH MONARCHY TO AVOID SUPREMACY OF JUDICIARY OVER PEOPLE'S WILL.
Comments